Re: ANCIENT EGYPT- GOD=G_uv

From: ZenIsWhen (ZenIsWhen_at_anywhere.com)
Date: 06/21/04 

Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 13:18:59 -0400

"George Hammond" <research137@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:XJDBc.154195$Ly.67251@attbi_s01...
>
> "Russell E. Rierson" <analog57@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:c410ffa5.0406202124.2fcd4fe4@posting.google.com...
> > TMG <TMG@Nowhere.org> wrote in message
> news:<eNqdnbJfoqQKiUvdRVn-jw@comcast.com>...
> > > To begin, please understand the source:
> > >
> > > http://www.insolitology.com/mail/Rierson.htm
> > >
> > > Of course - Rierson could/may be a Hammond sock puppet.
> >
>
> <snip "philawsephy" razza m tazz having no relevance
> to an experimentally confirmed axiomatic physics
> discovery>

You have bellowed this crap before?
WHAT EXPERIMENT?
What discvovery? Your babbling is NOT a discovery - it's an assertion ....
and a psychpotic one at that!

>
>
> > >
> > > Make a physical, testable prediction that Hammond's theory uniquely
> > > predicts. Set up the bench test, test it, and publish the results.
> > >
> > > If you can't devise a test, your/Hammond's theory is bogus.
> > >
> > > If you can't do the test, you/Hammond are a fraud.
>
> [Hammond]
> THE TEST HAS ALREADY BEEN DEVISED AND THE
> THEORY PASSES THE TEST.

Where? How?
Or are we talking about you just shoveling more crap to justify the first
pile?

 IT PREDICTS AND EXPLAINS
> 100 YEARS OF HERETOFORE UNPREDICTED AND UNEXPLAINED
> PSYCHOMETRY RESULTS.
> WHAT THE FCUK'S WRONG WITH YOU?

IOW ..... you shoveled more deranged and deluded crap to, fraudulently,
defend the first pile of crap!

BTW ............. claiming to be a scientist - you SHOULD know that the
details of ANY experiment must be presented so that other scientists can
duplicate the experiment to test your hypothesis.
What are those details? Where is the "lab work"? Where is the "work" that
other scientists can do to support/rebut your theory?

MORE (deranged) CLAIMS ARE NOT EXPERIMENTS, scumbag!!!!!!

>
> > >
> > > Put up or shut up.
>
> Hammond]
> THE TEST HAS ALREADY BEEN DEVISED AND THE
> THEORY PASSES THE TEST. IT PREDICTS AND EXPLAINS
> 100 YEARS OF HERETOFORE UNPREDICTED AND UNEXPLAINED
> PSYCHOMETRY RESULTS.
> WHAT THE FCUK'S WRONG WITH YOU?
>
> >
> >
> > Thanks for the help
>
> Hammond]
> THE TEST HAS ALREADY BEEN DEVISED AND THE
> THEORY PASSES THE TEST. IT PREDICTS AND EXPLAINS
> 100 YEARS OF HERETOFORE UNPREDICTED AND UNEXPLAINED
> PSYCHOMETRY RESULTS.
> WHAT THE FCUK'S WRONG WITH YOU?
>
> <snip "philawsephy" razza m tazz having no relevance
> to an experimentally confirmed axiomatic physics
> discovery>
>
> Yaaawnnnnnn.......

Obviously not enough oxygen getting your mini brain!

>
> ====================================
> A PILE OF CRAP, WEBSITE
> http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
> mirror site:
> http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
> ====================================
>
>

Relevant Pages

  • Re: The Evolutionist Hinders Scientific Discovery
    ... are hindering scientific discovery. ... scientific method is very simple - a basic "crap detector" if you ... They have some drugs that might help. ... Are you claiming that we should, as scientists, open up our minds to ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Random numbers
    ... > Not forgetting Knuth's discovery that "a random number generator designed ... > random tends to be crap" (I paraphrase slightly not having the book to ... Peter ...
    (microsoft.public.vc.mfc)
  • Re: GOD=G_uv FOR IQs OVER 150
    ... >> The same crap that has been trashed as garbage since the very first day ... > Religion and, now Science, are up against. ... > community of this discovery. ... and the welfare of the world depends ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: savanna chimps are savanna dwellers, .....
    ... Science is a process of discovery. ... then you admit you just made all that crap up as went along? ... Since you cite nothing, it simply proves you have no basis for your ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
Quantcast