Re: Light speed invariance
From: Dirk Van de moortel (dirkvandemoortel_at_ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com)
Date: 06/22/04
- Next message: Peter Kinane: "Re: 'Source and Observer'"
- Previous message: Patrick Reany: "Re: What is the Standard Model"
- In reply to: Androcles: "Re: Light speed invariance"
- Next in thread: Androcles: "Re: Light speed invariance"
- Reply: Androcles: "Re: Light speed invariance"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 21:02:43 GMT
"Androcles" <androc1es@nospamblueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message news:1R0Cc.95$l06.1213558@news-text.cableinet.net...
[snip]
> "Let x^2 = 5
> then
> x = sqrt(5) or x = -sqrt(5)" -Dinky the Deranged.
> "This way sqrt is ALWAYS positive."-Dinky the Deranged.
> ROFLMAO!
You'll need a catheter soon.
Dirk Vdm
- Next message: Peter Kinane: "Re: 'Source and Observer'"
- Previous message: Patrick Reany: "Re: What is the Standard Model"
- In reply to: Androcles: "Re: Light speed invariance"
- Next in thread: Androcles: "Re: Light speed invariance"
- Reply: Androcles: "Re: Light speed invariance"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
