Re: The making of arbitrary timerate in gravity
From: Mitchell (macromitch_at_internetCDS.com)
Date: 06/23/04
- Next message: Bill Hobba: "Re: Effectuationism and Value"
- Previous message: Gregory L. Hansen: "Re: Radius of electron"
- In reply to: Sam Wormley: "Re: The making of arbitrary timerate in gravity"
- Next in thread: Sam Wormley: "Re: The making of arbitrary timerate in gravity"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 22 Jun 2004 18:48:24 -0700
Sam Wormley <swormley1@mchsi.com> wrote in message news:<40D63ACB.38EB8E4F@mchsi.com>...
> Mitchell wrote:
> >
> > Time does end at the event horizon.
>
> It has been pointed out to you several times that this is not
> true for the general case. Get yourself a copy of [and work
> the problems in]:
>
> "Spacetime Physics: Introduction to Special Relativity"
> Taylor & Wheeler
> New York W H Freeman, c1992,
> QC173.65 T37 1991,
> 530.1/1 20,
> ISBN 0716723271
I don't care if it isn't probable. If its possible; if it can happen
at all proves my point that something is wrong.
If time ends at the EH and at the singularity what's inbetween?
There is no time inbetween. It's a divorce of time from space.
Space-time without time is nonsense.
That's my point. Thankyou.
Mitch Raemsch
-- Light Falls --
- Next message: Bill Hobba: "Re: Effectuationism and Value"
- Previous message: Gregory L. Hansen: "Re: Radius of electron"
- In reply to: Sam Wormley: "Re: The making of arbitrary timerate in gravity"
- Next in thread: Sam Wormley: "Re: The making of arbitrary timerate in gravity"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|