Re: Experimental disproof of the theory of Relativity
From: Cozmo Man (cozmologist_at_scientist.com)
Date: 06/24/04
- Next message: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: Chris Hillman"
- Previous message: Peter K.: "Re: Michealson & Morley Experiment was a Farce"
- In reply to: Ballisticus: "Re: Experimental disproof of the theory of Relativity"
- Next in thread: Ballisticus: "Re: Experimental disproof of the theory of Relativity"
- Reply: Ballisticus: "Re: Experimental disproof of the theory of Relativity"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 20:45:19 -0700
Ballisticus wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 08:58:08 -0500, Tom Roberts
> <tjroberts@lucent.com> wrote:
>
>> Ballisticus wrote:
>>> I know [OWLS] is c wrt its source.
>>
>> That method of "doing physics" went out with Aristotle. It does not
>> work. The ONLY way that has been found to work is to perform
>> experiments and apply the scientific method to their results.
>
> Even you god, Einstein says light moves at 'c' relative to its
> source.
>
You are mistaken. You could only say this if you did not follow the
point that Einstein makes.
- Next message: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: Chris Hillman"
- Previous message: Peter K.: "Re: Michealson & Morley Experiment was a Farce"
- In reply to: Ballisticus: "Re: Experimental disproof of the theory of Relativity"
- Next in thread: Ballisticus: "Re: Experimental disproof of the theory of Relativity"
- Reply: Ballisticus: "Re: Experimental disproof of the theory of Relativity"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
