Re: Experimental disproof of the theory of Relativity
From: Ballisticus (B_at_..(Ballisticus))
Date: 06/24/04
- Next message: Androcles: "Re: A Ballistic photon theory"
- Previous message: Ballisticus: "Re: Experimental disproof of the theory of Relativity"
- In reply to: Cozmo Man: "Re: Experimental disproof of the theory of Relativity"
- Next in thread: Cozmo Man: "Re: Experimental disproof of the theory of Relativity"
- Reply: Cozmo Man: "Re: Experimental disproof of the theory of Relativity"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 11:21:41 GMT
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 20:45:19 -0700, "Cozmo Man" <cozmologist@scientist.com>
wrote:
>Ballisticus wrote:
>> On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 08:58:08 -0500, Tom Roberts
>> <tjroberts@lucent.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Ballisticus wrote:
>>>> I know [OWLS] is c wrt its source.
>>>
>>> That method of "doing physics" went out with Aristotle. It does not
>>> work. The ONLY way that has been found to work is to perform
>>> experiments and apply the scientific method to their results.
>>
>> Even your god, Einstein says light moves at 'c' relative to its
>> source.
>>
>
>You are mistaken. You could only say this if you did not follow the
>point that Einstein makes.
>
Einstein correctly believed that an observer moving with a light source would
always measure the velocity of its light to be c. Do you still want to argue?
- Next message: Androcles: "Re: A Ballistic photon theory"
- Previous message: Ballisticus: "Re: Experimental disproof of the theory of Relativity"
- In reply to: Cozmo Man: "Re: Experimental disproof of the theory of Relativity"
- Next in thread: Cozmo Man: "Re: Experimental disproof of the theory of Relativity"
- Reply: Cozmo Man: "Re: Experimental disproof of the theory of Relativity"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|