sci.physics.relativity
By Thread

6271 messages sorted by: [ date ]

---

Starting: 06/30/04
Ending: 07/31/04

• Graviton n8ppq (07/31/04)
• Where does intelligence come from? * Mitchell (07/31/04)
  • Re: Where does intelligence come from? * Sam Wormley (07/31/04)
  • Re: Where does intelligence come from? * Eric Gisse (07/31/04)
• GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % George Hammond (07/30/04)
• Simple Clock Question. Henri Wilson (07/30/04)
  • Re: Simple Clock Question. Dirk Van de moortel (07/30/04)
  • Re: Simple Clock Question. Eric Gisse (07/31/04)
• If I shone a flashlight while travelling at the speed of light... Scott (07/30/04)
  • Re: If I shone a flashlight while travelling at the speed of light... Henri Wilson (07/30/04)
  • Re: If I shone a flashlight while travelling at the speed of light... Dirk Van de moortel (07/30/04)
    • Re: If I shone a flashlight while travelling at the speed of light... Bill Hobba (07/30/04)
  • Re: If I shone a flashlight while travelling at the speed of light... Robert J. Kolker (07/30/04)
• The origin of zombiism Pentcho Valev (07/30/04)
  • Re: The origin of zombiism N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (07/30/04)
    • Re: The origin of zombiism Bill Hobba (07/30/04)
• Retarded propagation of magnetic field leads to contradiction Eugene (07/30/04)
  • Re: Retarded propagation of magnetic field leads to contradiction Dirk Van de moortel (07/30/04)
    • Re: Retarded propagation of magnetic field leads to contradiction Eugene (07/30/04)
      • Re: Retarded propagation of magnetic field leads to contradiction Dirk Van de moortel (07/30/04)
      • Re: Retarded propagation of magnetic field leads to contradiction Eugene (07/30/04)
      • Re: Retarded propagation of magnetic field leads to contradiction Dirk Van de moortel (07/30/04)
  • Re: Retarded propagation of magnetic field leads to contradiction Myxococcus xanthus (07/30/04)
    • Re: Retarded propagation of magnetic field leads to contradiction Dirk Van de moortel (07/30/04)
    • Re: Retarded propagation of magnetic field leads to contradiction Eugene (07/30/04)
  • Re: Retarded propagation of magnetic field leads to contradiction Androcles (07/30/04)
  • Re: Retarded propagation of magnetic field leads to contradiction J.J. Simplicio (07/30/04)
    • Re: Retarded propagation of magnetic field leads to contradiction Androcles (07/30/04)
      • Re: Retarded propagation of magnetic field leads to contradiction J.J. Simplicio (07/30/04)
      • Re: Retarded propagation of magnetic field leads to contradiction Androcles (07/30/04)
      • Re: Retarded propagation of magnetic field leads to contradiction Dirk Van de moortel (07/30/04)
  • Re: Retarded propagation of magnetic field leads to contradiction Jon Bell (07/30/04)
  • Re: Retarded propagation of magnetic field leads to contradiction Tom Roberts (07/31/04)
• Ree: Possibly the End of Einstein's Relativity ? Peter K. (07/30/04)
• Possibly the End of Einstein's Relativity ? Peter K. (07/30/04)
  • Re: Possibly the End of Einstein's Relativity ? Didier Lauwaert (07/30/04)
    • Re: Possibly the End of Einstein's Relativity ? Dirk Van de moortel (07/30/04)
      • Re: Possibly the End of Einstein's Relativity ? Robert J. Kolker (07/30/04)
      • Re: Possibly the End of Einstein's Relativity ? Dirk Van de moortel (07/30/04)
  • Re: Possibly the End of Einstein's Relativity ? Eric Gisse (07/30/04)
  • Re: Possibly the End of Einstein's Relativity ? Peter K. (07/30/04)
    • Re: Possibly the End of Einstein's Relativity ? Dirk Van de moortel (07/30/04)
      • Re: Possibly the End of Einstein's Relativity ? V ertner Vergon (07/30/04)
      • Re: Possibly the End of Einstein's Relativity ? Dirk Van de moortel (07/30/04)
      • Re: Possibly the End of Einstein's Relativity ? Eric Gisse (07/30/04)
    • Re: Possibly the End of Einstein's Relativity ? Androcles (07/30/04)
• Lorentz transformations are not universal and not exact Eugene (07/30/04)
  • Re: Lorentz transformations are not universal and not exact Dirk Van de moortel (07/30/04)
    • Re: Lorentz transformations are not universal and not exact Eugene (07/30/04)
      • Re: Lorentz transformations are not universal and not exact Dirk Van de moortel (07/30/04)
  • Re: Lorentz transformations are not universal and not exact Perfectly Innocent (07/30/04)
    • Re: Lorentz transformations are not universal and not exact Eugene (07/30/04)
      • Re: Lorentz transformations are not universal and not exact Dirk Van de moortel (07/30/04)
      • Re: Lorentz transformations are not universal and not exact Bill Hobba (07/31/04)
• Einstein (1905) Absurdities Eleaticus (07/30/04)
• (SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals Eleaticus (07/30/04)
• Unknown Functions & Einstein's Incompetence Eleaticus (07/30/04)
• Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws Eleaticus (07/30/04)
• Gravity is a Continuum Mitchell (07/30/04)
  • Re: Gravity is a Continuum Uncle Al (07/30/04)
    • Re: Gravity is a Continuum Mitchell (07/30/04)
      • Re: Gravity is a Continuum Eric Gisse (07/30/04)
  • Re: Gravity is a Continuum Eric Gisse (07/30/04)
    • Re: Gravity is a Continuum ZZBunker (07/30/04)
      • Re: Gravity is a Continuum Eric Gisse (07/30/04)
    • Re: Gravity is a Continuum Mitchell (07/30/04)
      • Re: Gravity is a Continuum Sam Wormley (07/30/04)
      • Re: Gravity is a Continuum Eric Gisse (07/31/04)
      • Re: Gravity is a Continuum Dale Trynor (07/31/04)
  • Re: Gravity is a Continuum davidoff404 (07/30/04)
• Defining physics Patrick Reany (07/30/04)
  • Re: Defining physics Daniel Weston (07/30/04)
    • Re: Defining physics Patrick Reany (07/30/04)
      • Re: Defining physics Daniel Weston (07/30/04)
      • Re: Defining physics Patrick Reany (07/31/04)
    • Re: Defining physics Androcles (07/30/04)
  • Re: Defining physics Harry (07/30/04)
    • Re: Defining physics Patrick Reany (07/30/04)
      • Re: Defining physics Androcles (07/30/04)
  • Re: Defining physics Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (07/30/04)
  • Re: Defining physics Bilge (07/30/04)
    • Re: Defining physics Daniel Weston (07/30/04)
      • Re: Defining physics ueb (07/30/04)
  • Re: Defining physics Perfectly Innocent (07/30/04)
    • Re: Defining physics Robert J. Kolker (07/30/04)
• the heart of a paradox Ken and Vicki (07/29/04)
  • Re: the heart of a paradox Jim Black (07/30/04)
    • Re: the heart of a paradox Ken and Vicki (07/30/04)
      • Re: the heart of a paradox Ken and Vicki (07/30/04)
      • Re: the heart of a paradox V ertner Vergon (07/30/04)
      • Re: the heart of a paradox V ertner Vergon (07/30/04)
  • Re: the heart of a paradox Tom Roberts (07/31/04)
• Re: What Hawking REALLY meant and his theory nightbat (07/29/04)
  • Re: What Hawking REALLY meant and his theory Mad Scientist (07/29/04)
    • Re: What Hawking REALLY meant and his theory Dale Trynor (07/30/04)
      • Re: What Hawking REALLY meant and his theory nightbat (07/30/04)
      • Re: What Hawking REALLY meant and his theory vonroach (07/30/04)
      • Re: What Hawking REALLY meant and his theory Dale Trynor (07/30/04)
      • Re: What Hawking REALLY meant and his theory Dale Trynor (07/30/04)
• Hawking and Penrose at GR 17 Dublin 2004 Jack Sarfatti (07/29/04)
  • Re: Hawking and Penrose at GR 17 Dublin 2004 Xerxes (07/30/04)
  • Re: Hawking and Penrose at GR 17 Dublin 2004 Bob Chipeska (07/30/04)
    • Re: Hawking and Penrose at GR 17 Dublin 2004 Richard Herring (07/30/04)
• The Fundamental Flaw of SR. kenseto (07/29/04)
  • Re: The Fundamental Flaw of SR. Harry (07/29/04)
    • Re: The Fundamental Flaw of SR. kenseto (07/29/04)
      • Re: The Fundamental Flaw of SR. Harry (07/30/04)
      • Re: The Fundamental Flaw of SR. kenseto (07/30/04)
  • Re: The Fundamental Flaw of SR. Nick (07/29/04)
    • Re: The Fundamental Flaw of SR. Androcles (07/29/04)
    • Re: The Fundamental Flaw of SR. kenseto (07/29/04)
      • Re: The Fundamental Flaw of SR. Nick (07/29/04)
      • Re: The Fundamental Flaw of SR. Androcles (07/30/04)
  • Re: The Fundamental Flaw of SR. Benno Muilwyk (07/29/04)
    • Re: The Fundamental Flaw of SR. Dirk Van de moortel (07/29/04)
    • Re: The Fundamental Flaw of SR. Androcles (07/30/04)
      • Re: The Fundamental Flaw of SR. Eric Gisse (07/30/04)
      • Re: The Fundamental Flaw of SR. Paul Miller (07/30/04)
      • Re: The Fundamental Flaw of SR. FrediFizzx (07/30/04)
      • Re: The Fundamental Flaw of SR. Androcles (07/30/04)
      • Re: The Fundamental Flaw of SR. Eric Gisse (07/31/04)
      • Re: The Fundamental Flaw of SR. kenseto (07/30/04)
      • Re: The Fundamental Flaw of SR. Benno Muilwyk (07/30/04)
    • Re: The Fundamental Flaw of SR. kenseto (07/30/04)
      • Re: The Fundamental Flaw of SR. Benno Muilwyk (07/30/04)
      • Re: The Fundamental Flaw of SR. kenseto (07/30/04)
• Science, Religion, Philosophy. Franco (07/29/04)
  • Re: Science, Religion, Philosophy. Uncle Al (07/29/04)
  • Re: Science, Religion, Philosophy. JonTi (07/29/04)
    • Re: Science, Religion, Philosophy. Daniel Weston (07/29/04)
      • Re: Science, Religion, Philosophy. Androcles (07/30/04)
    • Re: Science, Religion, Philosophy. Franco (07/29/04)
      • Re: Science, Religion, Philosophy. JonTi (07/30/04)
  • Re: Science, Religion, Philosophy. Patrick Reany (07/30/04)
    • Re: Science, Religion, Philosophy. Kenneth Doyle (07/30/04)
      • Re: Science, Religion, Philosophy. John Wilkins (07/30/04)
      • Re: Science, Religion, Philosophy. Kenneth Doyle (07/30/04)
      • Re: Science, Religion, Philosophy. John Wilkins (07/30/04)
      • Re: Science, Religion, Philosophy. Kenneth Doyle (07/30/04)
      • Re: Science, Religion, Philosophy. John Wilkins (07/30/04)
      • Re: Science, Religion, Philosophy. Kenneth Doyle (07/30/04)
      • Re: Science, Religion, Philosophy. John Wilkins (07/31/04)
      • Re: Science, Religion, Philosophy. Robert J. Kolker (07/30/04)
      • Re: Science, Religion, Philosophy. Franco (07/30/04)
      • Re: Science, Religion, Philosophy. Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (07/30/04)
    • Re: Science, Religion, Philosophy. ZZBunker (07/30/04)
    • Re: Science, Religion, Philosophy. Franco (07/30/04)
    • Re: Science, Religion, Philosophy. ueb (07/30/04)
  • Re: Science, Religion, Philosophy. Albert (07/30/04)
• "The map is not the Territory"... Paul Stowe (07/29/04)
  • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... stan (07/29/04)
    • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... Martin Hogbin (07/29/04)
    • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... Bilge (07/29/04)
      • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... stan (07/29/04)
      • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... Bilge (07/29/04)
      • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... Gerry (07/29/04)
      • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... Dirk Van de moortel (07/29/04)
      • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... Gerry (07/29/04)
      • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... Dirk Van de moortel (07/29/04)
      • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... Gerry (07/29/04)
      • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... shuba (07/29/04)
      • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... Dirk Van de moortel (07/30/04)
      • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... frankly (07/30/04)
      • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... Dirk Van de moortel (07/30/04)
      • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... Oriel36 (07/30/04)
      • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... frankly (07/31/04)
      • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... greywolf42 (07/31/04)
      • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... greywolf42 (07/31/04)
      • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... Bilge (07/30/04)
    • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... Robert J. Kolker (07/29/04)
      • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... stan (07/29/04)
      • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... Robert J. Kolker (07/29/04)
      • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... Bill Hobba (07/31/04)
      • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... stan (07/31/04)
      • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... Bill Hobba (07/31/04)
    • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... Bill Hobba (07/30/04)
  • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... Harry (07/29/04)
    • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... stephen_at_nomail.com (07/29/04)
      • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... Sandman (07/29/04)
  • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... Bilge (07/29/04)
    • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... Paul Stowe (07/30/04)
  • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... Tom Roberts (07/29/04)
    • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... Daniel Weston (07/29/04)
      • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... Bilge (07/30/04)
      • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... Daniel Weston (07/30/04)
      • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... Dirk Van de moortel (07/30/04)
      • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... Bilge (07/30/04)
      • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... Daniel Weston (07/30/04)
      • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... Androcles (07/30/04)
      • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... Bilge (07/30/04)
      • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... Daniel Weston (07/30/04)
      • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... Robert J. Kolker (07/30/04)
      • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... Androcles (07/30/04)
      • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... Bill Hobba (07/30/04)
    • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... Paul Stowe (07/30/04)
      • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... Bilge (07/30/04)
      • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... Tom Roberts (07/31/04)
  • Re: "The map is not the Territory"... Andr? Michaud (07/30/04)
• Everything was thrown apart Mitchell (07/29/04)
  • Re: Everything was thrown apart Sam Wormley (07/29/04)
  • Re: Everything was thrown apart Uncle Al (07/29/04)
  • Re: Everything was thrown apart Eric Gisse (07/29/04)
  • Re: Everything was thrown apart MorituriMax (07/29/04)
  • Re: Everything was thrown apart Jan Kalin (07/29/04)
    • Re: Everything was thrown apart Dirk Van de moortel (07/30/04)
• A challenge to non-SRians Paul Miller (07/28/04)
  • Re: A challenge to non-SRians Eric Gisse (07/28/04)
  • Re: A challenge to non-SRians Bill Hobba (07/28/04)
    • Re: A challenge to non-SRians Paul Stowe (07/29/04)
      • Physics is not synomymous with Newtonism Patrick Reany (07/29/04)
      • Re: Physics is not synomymous with Newtonism Harry (07/29/04)
      • Re: Physics is not synomymous with Newtonism Patrick Reany (07/29/04)
      • Re: Physics is not synomymous with Newtonism Australopithecus Afarensis (07/30/04)
      • Re: Physics is not synomymous with Newtonism Robert J. Kolker (07/30/04)
      • Re: Physics is not synomymous with Newtonism Harry (07/30/04)
      • Re: Physics is not synomymous with Newtonism Paul Stowe (07/30/04)
      • Re: Physics is not synomymous with Newtonism Androcles (07/30/04)
      • Re: Physics is not synomymous with Newtonism Patrick Reany (07/30/04)
      • Re: Physics is not synomymous with Newtonism Bill Hobba (07/30/04)
      • Re: Physics is not synomymous with Newtonism Paul Stowe (07/30/04)
      • Re: Physics is not synomymous with Newtonism Patrick Reany (07/30/04)
      • Re: Physics is not synomymous with Newtonism Bill Hobba (07/31/04)
      • Re: A challenge to non-SRians Bill Hobba (07/29/04)
      • Re: A challenge to non-SRians Bilge (07/30/04)
  • Re: A challenge to non-SRians Androcles (07/29/04)
    • Re: A challenge to non-SRians Eric Gisse (07/29/04)
    • Re: A challenge to non-SRians Bilge (07/30/04)
  • Re: A challenge to non-SRians greywolf42 (07/29/04)
  • Re: A challenge to non-SRians Igor (07/29/04)
    • Re: A challenge to non-SRians Androcles (07/29/04)
      • Re: A challenge to non-SRians Paul Cardinale (07/29/04)
      • Re: A challenge to non-SRians Androcles (07/30/04)
  • Re: A challenge to non-SRians Harry (07/29/04)
    • Re: A challenge to non-SRians Paul Miller (07/29/04)
      • Re: A challenge to non-SRians N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (07/30/04)
      • Re: A challenge to non-SRians Harry (07/30/04)
    • Re: A challenge to non-SRians Peter Kinane (07/29/04)
  • Re: A challenge to non-SRians Paul Miller (07/29/04)
    • Re: A challenge to non-SRians Androcles (07/29/04)
      • Re: A challenge to non-SRians Paul Miller (07/30/04)
      • Re: A challenge to non-SRians Androcles (07/30/04)
      • Re: A challenge to non-SRians Paul Miller (07/30/04)
      • Re: A challenge to non-SRians Androcles (07/30/04)
      • Re: A challenge to non-SRians Dirk Van de moortel (07/30/04)
      • Re: A challenge to non-SRians Eric Gisse (07/30/04)
      • Re: A challenge to non-SRians greywolf42 (07/31/04)
      • Re: A challenge to non-SRians greywolf42 (07/30/04)
  • Re: A challenge to non-SRians Peter Kinane (07/29/04)
    • Re: A challenge to non-SRians Harry (07/29/04)
      • Re: A challenge to non-SRians Harry (07/29/04)
      • Re: A challenge to non-SRians Peter Kinane (07/29/04)
    • Re: A challenge to non-SRians Peter Kinane (07/30/04)
  • Re: A challenge to non-SRians Peter Kinane (07/29/04)
  • Re: A challenge to non-SRians Bilge (07/29/04)
  • Re: A challenge to non-SRians Dirk Van de moortel (07/30/04)
• GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % George Hammond (07/28/04)
  • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % George Hammond (07/28/04)
    • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % George Hammond (07/29/04)
    • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % Jim Black (07/29/04)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % George Hammond (07/29/04)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % Dan Baldwin (07/29/04)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % George Hammond (07/29/04)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % Dan Baldwin (07/29/04)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % Jacob W. Haller (07/29/04)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % George Hammond (07/30/04)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % Otto Bahn (07/30/04)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % David (07/30/04)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % George Hammond (07/30/04)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % Earle Jones (07/29/04)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % George Hammond (07/30/04)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % TMG (07/30/04)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % George Hammond (07/30/04)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % TMG (07/30/04)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % George Hammond (07/30/04)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % TMG (07/30/04)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % TMG (07/31/04)
    • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % Earle Jones (07/29/04)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % George Hammond (07/30/04)
    • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % Earle Jones (07/29/04)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % George Hammond (07/30/04)
  • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % George Hammond (07/28/04)
  • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % Richard Ulrich (07/28/04)
    • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % George Hammond (07/28/04)
  • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % Sam Wormley (07/29/04)
    • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % George Hammond (07/29/04)
  • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % Rick Cvejic (07/29/04)
    • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % George Hammond (07/29/04)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % Rick Cvejic (07/30/04)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % George Hammond (07/30/04)
  • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % Goran Dhemmeog (07/29/04)
    • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % George Hammond (07/29/04)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % Goran Dhemmeog (07/30/04)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % George Hammond (07/30/04)
    • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % Henry (07/29/04)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % Goran Dhemmeog (07/30/04)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % George Hammond (07/30/04)
  • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % Evgenij Barsukov (07/29/04)
    • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % George Hammond (07/29/04)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % Evgenij Barsukov (07/29/04)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % George Hammond (07/29/04)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % Evgenij Barsukov (07/30/04)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % George Hammond (07/30/04)
    • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % Goran Dhemmeog (07/30/04)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % George Hammond (07/30/04)
  • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % The Ghost In The Machine (07/29/04)
    • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % George Hammond (07/29/04)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % Pyriform (07/29/04)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % The Ghost In The Machine (07/30/04)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % Pyriform (07/30/04)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % George Hammond (07/30/04)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % George Hammond (07/30/04)
      • Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 % George Hammond (07/30/04)
• Re: Insight Collection !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.............. ... ueb (07/28/04)
• Re: Will the LIGO Experiment Work? Androcles (07/28/04)
• Overlightvelocities josefmatz (07/28/04)
  • Re: Overlightvelocities Dirk Van de moortel (07/28/04)
    • Re: Overlightvelocities xxein (07/29/04)
      • Re: Overlightvelocities Androcles (07/29/04)
      • Re: Overlightvelocities Dirk Van de moortel (07/29/04)
  • Re: Overlightvelocities ueb (07/29/04)
  • Re: Overlightvelocities Bilge (07/30/04)
• Question about state of atom physics josefmatz (07/28/04)
• Sagnac and ballistic emission Harry (07/28/04)
  • Re: Sagnac and ballistic emission Henri Le Neuviere (07/29/04)
    • Re: Sagnac and ballistic emission Harry (07/29/04)
      • Re: Sagnac and ballistic emission Henri Wilson (07/29/04)
      • Re: Sagnac and ballistic emission Harry (07/30/04)
    • Re: Sagnac and ballistic emission Androcles (07/29/04)
      • Re: Sagnac and ballistic emission Harry (07/29/04)
      • Re: Sagnac and ballistic emission Henri Wilson (07/29/04)
      • Re: Sagnac and ballistic emission Harry (07/30/04)
      • Re: Sagnac and ballistic emission Dirk Van de moortel (07/30/04)
      • Re: Sagnac and ballistic emission Henri Wilson (07/30/04)
• SR in hyperspheric Universe - new paradox? Jan Frejlak (07/28/04)
  • Re: SR in hyperspheric Universe - new paradox? Tom Roberts (07/28/04)
    • Re: SR in hyperspheric Universe - new paradox? Jan Frejlak (07/29/04)
      • Re: SR in hyperspheric Universe - new paradox? Tom Roberts (07/29/04)
  • Re: SR in hyperspheric Universe - new paradox? Perfectly Innocent (07/28/04)
  • Re: SR in hyperspheric Universe - new paradox? Perfectly Innocent (07/29/04)
    • Re: SR in hyperspheric Universe - new paradox? Jan Frejlak (07/29/04)
• SR wrong - no. Nick (07/28/04)
  • Re: SR wrong - no. Dirk Van de moortel (07/28/04)
  • Re: SR wrong - no. Harry (07/28/04)
    • Re: SR wrong - no. Dirk Van de moortel (07/28/04)
      • Re: SR wrong - no. Harry (07/28/04)
      • Re: SR wrong - no. Dirk Van de moortel (07/28/04)
      • Re: SR wrong - no. Harry (07/28/04)
      • Re: SR wrong - no. Dirk Van de moortel (07/28/04)
      • Re: SR wrong - no. Harry (07/29/04)
      • Re: SR wrong - no. Henri Le Neuviere (07/29/04)
      • Re: SR wrong - no. Harry (07/29/04)
      • Re: SR wrong - no. Dirk Van de moortel (07/29/04)
      • Re: SR wrong - no. Harry (07/30/04)
      • Re: SR wrong - no. Dirk Van de moortel (07/30/04)
      • Re: SR wrong - no. Harry (07/30/04)
      • Re: SR wrong - no. Dirk Van de moortel (07/30/04)
      • Re: SR wrong - no. Harry (07/30/04)
      • Re: SR wrong - no. Dirk Van de moortel (07/30/04)
  • Re: SR wrong - no. Androcles (07/28/04)
    • Re: SR wrong - no. Dirk Van de moortel (07/28/04)
    • Re: SR wrong - no. Bilge (07/29/04)
  • Re: SR wrong - no. V ertner Vergon (07/28/04)
    • Re: SR wrong - no. Dirk Van de moortel (07/28/04)
      • Re: SR wrong - no. V ertner Vergon (07/29/04)
    • Re: SR wrong - no. Harry (07/29/04)
      • Re: SR wrong - no. Henri Le Neuviere (07/29/04)
      • Re: SR wrong - no. Harry (07/29/04)
      • Re: SR wrong - no. V ertner Vergon (07/29/04)
      • Re: SR wrong - no. Harry (07/30/04)
      • Re: SR wrong - no. Henri Wilson (07/30/04)
      • Re: SR wrong - no. Henri Wilson (07/30/04)
      • Re: SR wrong - no. V ertner Vergon (07/29/04)
    • Re: SR wrong - no. Henri Le Neuviere (07/29/04)
      • Re: SR wrong - no. V ertner Vergon (07/29/04)
  • Re: SR wrong - no. Martin Hogbin (07/28/04)
    • Re: SR wrong - no. Henri Le Neuviere (07/29/04)
  • Re: SR wrong - no. Bill Hobba (07/29/04)
  • Re: SR wrong - no. Eric Baird (07/29/04)
    • Re: SR wrong - no. Bill Hobba (07/29/04)
    • Re: SR wrong - no. Bill Hobba (07/29/04)
      • Re: SR wrong - no. Australopithecus Afarensis (07/29/04)
      • Re: SR wrong - no. Bill Hobba (07/30/04)
      • Re: SR wrong - no. Australopithecus Afarensis (07/30/04)
      • Re: SR wrong - no. Bill Hobba (07/30/04)
  • Re: SR wrong - no. David Canzi -- non-mailable address (07/29/04)
    • Re: SR wrong - no. Androcles (07/29/04)
      • Re: SR wrong - no. David Canzi -- non-mailable address (07/29/04)
      • Re: SR wrong - no. Androcles (07/29/04)
      • Re: SR wrong - no. David Canzi -- non-mailable address (07/29/04)
      • Re: SR wrong - no. Androcles (07/30/04)
      • Re: SR wrong - no. Dirk Van de moortel (07/30/04)
      • Re: SR wrong - no. David Canzi -- non-mailable address (07/30/04)
    • Re: SR wrong - no. Harry (07/29/04)
    • Re: SR wrong - no. xxein (07/30/04)
  • Re: SR wrong - no. Henri Le Neuviere (07/29/04)
• Visualizing photon V.K.Tamhane (07/28/04)
  • Re: Visualizing photon Nick (07/28/04)
    • Re: Visualizing photon V.K.Tamhane (07/30/04)
      • Re: Visualizing photon N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (07/30/04)
  • Re: Visualizing photon Uncle Al (07/28/04)
    • Re: Visualizing photon V.K.Tamhane (07/29/04)
• Relativity as zombiism Pentcho Valev (07/28/04)
  • Re: Relativity as zombiism Harry (07/28/04)
  • Re: Relativity as zombiism Nick (07/28/04)
    • Re: Relativity as zombiism Bill Hobba (07/28/04)
      • Re: Relativity as zombiism Pentcho Valev (07/28/04)
• The difference in acceleration - About Gravity's Strength Mitchell (07/28/04)
  • Re: The difference in acceleration - About Gravity's Strength Eric Gisse (07/28/04)
    • Re: The difference in acceleration - About Gravity's Strength Mitchell (07/28/04)
      • Re: The difference in acceleration - About Gravity's Strength Eric Gisse (07/28/04)
      • Re: The difference in acceleration - About Gravity's Strength Marcus Wellpoth (07/28/04)
      • Re: The difference in acceleration - About Gravity's Strength Uncle Al (07/29/04)
  • Re: The difference in acceleration - About Gravity's Strength Herman Family (07/28/04)
• Center of Gravity of Particles Mitchell (07/27/04)
  • Re: Center of Gravity of Particles Uncle Al (07/28/04)
    • Re: Center of Gravity of Particles Mike (07/29/04)
  • Re: Center of Gravity of Particles Eric Gisse (07/28/04)
    • Re: Center of Gravity of Particles Mitchell (07/28/04)
      • Re: Center of Gravity of Particles Marcus Wellpoth (07/28/04)
      • Re: Center of Gravity of Particles Eric Gisse (07/28/04)
      • Re: Center of Gravity of Particles Mitchell (07/29/04)
      • Re: Center of Gravity of Particles Eric Gisse (07/30/04)
      • Re: Center of Gravity of Particles MorituriMax (07/30/04)
      • Re: Center of Gravity of Particles MorituriMax (07/30/04)
      • Re: Center of Gravity of Particles Mitchell (07/30/04)
      • Re: Center of Gravity of Particles Eric Gisse (07/30/04)
      • Re: Center of Gravity of Particles Spaceman (07/30/04)
      • Re: Center of Gravity of Particles Eric Gisse (07/31/04)
      • Re: Center of Gravity of Particles Mitchell (07/31/04)
      • Re: Center of Gravity of Particles Uncle Al (07/29/04)
      • Re: Center of Gravity of Particles MorituriMax (07/29/04)
• I Broke the Cosmic Egg Mitchell (07/27/04)
  • Re: I Broke the Cosmic Egg Uncle Al (07/28/04)
  • Re: I Broke the Cosmic Egg Ichimusai (07/28/04)
• Sun's Magnetic Field reaches Earth & Must affect Earth's Orbit! Peter K. (07/27/04)
• Universe!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!....................... ... Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (07/27/04)
• Is special relativity falsifiable? Marcel Luttgens (07/27/04)
  • Re: Is special relativity falsifiable? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (07/27/04)
    • Re: Is special relativity falsifiable? Marcel Luttgens (07/27/04)
      • Re: Is special relativity falsifiable? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (07/27/04)
      • Re: Is special relativity falsifiable? Marcel Luttgens (07/28/04)
      • Re: Is special relativity falsifiable? Dirk Van de moortel (07/28/04)
      • Re: Is special relativity falsifiable? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (07/28/04)
  • Re: Is special relativity falsifiable? Androcles (07/27/04)
    • Re: Is special relativity falsifiable? Marcel Luttgens (07/28/04)
      • Re: Is special relativity falsifiable? Androcles (07/28/04)
    • Re: Is special relativity falsifiable? Eric Gisse (07/28/04)
      • Re: Is special relativity falsifiable? Dirk Van de moortel (07/28/04)
  • Re: Is special relativity falsifiable? Bilge (07/28/04)
    • Re: Is special relativity falsifiable? Marcel Luttgens (07/28/04)
      • Re: Is special relativity falsifiable? Bilge (07/29/04)
      • Re: Is special relativity falsifiable? Marcel Luttgens (07/29/04)
      • Re: Is special relativity falsifiable? Bilge (07/30/04)
      • Re: Is special relativity falsifiable? Marcel Luttgens (07/30/04)
      • Re: Is special relativity falsifiable? Bilge (07/30/04)
  • Re: Is special relativity falsifiable? Dirk Van de moortel (07/28/04)
    • Re: Is special relativity falsifiable? Marcel Luttgens (07/28/04)
  • Re: Is special relativity falsifiable? Tom Roberts (07/31/04)
• gravity's force vs. interatomic forces? Harry (07/27/04)
  • Re: gravity's force vs. interatomic forces? Tom Roberts (07/27/04)
    • Re: gravity's force vs. interatomic forces? Harry (07/27/04)
      • Re: gravity's force vs. interatomic forces? Dirk Van de moortel (07/27/04)
      • Re: gravity's force vs. interatomic forces? Harry (07/27/04)
      • Re: gravity's force vs. interatomic forces? Dirk Van de moortel (07/27/04)
• How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error. Robert (07/27/04)
  • Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error. Dirk Van de moortel (07/27/04)
    • Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error. Henri Le Neuviere (07/27/04)
      • Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error. Eric Gisse (07/28/04)
      • Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error. Dirk Van de moortel (07/28/04)
      • Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error. V ertner Vergon (07/29/04)
  • Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error. Eric Gisse (07/27/04)
    • Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error. The Ghost In The Machine (07/27/04)
      • Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error. Androcles (07/27/04)
      • Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error. Dirk Van de moortel (07/27/04)
      • Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error. Harry (07/28/04)
      • Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error. Dirk Van de moortel (07/28/04)
      • Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error. Harry (07/28/04)
      • Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error. David Evens (07/31/04)
      • Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error. Androcles (07/28/04)
      • Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error. Dirk Van de moortel (07/28/04)
      • Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error. Harry (07/28/04)
      • Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error. Dirk Van de moortel (07/28/04)
      • Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error. Harry (07/28/04)
      • Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error. Androcles (07/28/04)
      • Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error. Eric Gisse (07/27/04)
      • Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error. Androcles (07/28/04)
      • Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error. Eric Gisse (07/28/04)
      • Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error. Paul Cardinale (07/28/04)
      • Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error. Androcles (07/28/04)
      • Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error. Henri Le Neuviere (07/28/04)
      • Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error. Androcles (07/28/04)
      • Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error. David Evens (07/31/04)
      • Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error. Henri Le Neuviere (07/27/04)
      • Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error. Eric Gisse (07/27/04)
  • Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error. Dave (07/27/04)
    • Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error. Dirk Van de moortel (07/27/04)
    • Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error. Henri Le Neuviere (07/27/04)
      • Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error. Eric Gisse (07/28/04)
      • Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error. Dave (07/28/04)
      • Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error. Androcles (07/28/04)
      • Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error. David Evens (07/31/04)
      • Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error. Henri Le Neuviere (07/28/04)
      • Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error. YBM (07/28/04)
      • Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error. Henri Le Neuviere (07/29/04)
      • Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error. N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (07/29/04)
      • Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error. YBM (07/29/04)
      • Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error. Dave (07/29/04)
      • Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error. Henri Le Neuviere (07/29/04)
      • Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error. Dave (07/29/04)
      • Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error. Henri Wilson (07/29/04)
    • Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error. Eric Gisse (07/27/04)
  • Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error. Harry (07/27/04)
    • Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error. Henri Le Neuviere (07/27/04)
      • Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error. Harry (07/28/04)
      • Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error. Henri Le Neuviere (07/28/04)
      • Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error. Harry (07/29/04)
  • Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error. Bilge (07/28/04)
  • Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error. V ertner Vergon (07/28/04)
    • Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error. Henri Le Neuviere (07/28/04)
  • Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error. Robert J. Kolker (07/29/04)
    • Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error. Henri Le Neuviere (07/29/04)
• Transverse Doppler Shift & Gravitational Frequency Shift Australopithecus Afarensis (07/27/04)
  • Re: Transverse Doppler Shift & Gravitational Frequency Shift Dirk Van de moortel (07/27/04)
• FA: Five Rare Old Physics Books - Relativity, Particle Physics, Quantum mysteries, time travels, etc. Karl (07/27/04)
• Re: The 'Strong Force' is a fiction! (Part 1) Dr Chaos (07/26/04)
• Re: Photons are gravitational charge units Dr Chaos (07/26/04)
• relativity, speed of light postulate abs (07/26/04)
  • Re: relativity, speed of light postulate Jon Bell (07/26/04)
    • Re: relativity, speed of light postulate Androcles (07/27/04)
      • Re: relativity, speed of light postulate Dirk Van de moortel (07/27/04)
      • Re: relativity, speed of light postulate Igor (07/28/04)
      • Re: relativity, speed of light postulate Dirk Van de moortel (07/28/04)
      • Re: relativity, speed of light postulate Androcles (07/29/04)
      • Re: relativity, speed of light postulate Igor (07/29/04)
  • Re: relativity, speed of light postulate Bill Hobba (07/27/04)
  • Re: relativity, speed of light postulate Bruce Richmond (07/27/04)
    • Re: relativity, speed of light postulate Androcles (07/27/04)
      • Re: relativity, speed of light postulate Dirk Van de moortel (07/27/04)
  • Re: relativity, speed of light postulate Androcles (07/27/04)
    • Re: relativity, speed of light postulate Dirk Van de moortel (07/27/04)
    • Re: relativity, speed of light postulate The TimeLord (07/27/04)
      • Re: relativity, speed of light postulate Androcles (07/27/04)
  • Re: relativity, speed of light postulate kenseto (07/27/04)
  • Re: relativity, speed of light postulate Jim Black (07/27/04)
  • Re: relativity, speed of light postulate Dirk Van de moortel (07/28/04)
• Re: The 'Strong Force' a Pseudoscientific Fiction! Dr Chaos (07/26/04)
  • Re: The 'Strong Force' a Pseudoscientific Fiction! Dr Chaos (07/26/04)
• Re: Magnetic field is real - according to Feynman Dr Chaos (07/26/04)
• Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames JM Albuquerque (07/26/04)
  • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames Uncle Al (07/26/04)
    • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames JM Albuquerque (07/26/04)
  • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames Bilge (07/26/04)
  • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames Bill Hobba (07/26/04)
    • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames JM Albuquerque (07/27/04)
      • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames Uncle Al (07/27/04)
      • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames JM Albuquerque (07/27/04)
      • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames Ian Macmillan (07/29/04)
      • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames Bill Hobba (07/28/04)
      • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames JM Albuquerque (07/28/04)
      • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames Bill Hobba (07/29/04)
  • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames xxein (07/27/04)
  • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames The Ghost In The Machine (07/27/04)
    • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames JM Albuquerque (07/27/04)
      • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames The Ghost In The Machine (07/28/04)
  • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames Harry Conover (07/27/04)
  • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames Tom Roberts (07/28/04)
    • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames JM Albuquerque (07/28/04)
      • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames Tom Roberts (07/28/04)
      • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames JM Albuquerque (07/28/04)
      • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames Richard Henry (07/28/04)
      • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames JM Albuquerque (07/28/04)
      • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames Bill Rowe (07/29/04)
      • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames JM Albuquerque (07/29/04)
      • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames Richard Henry (07/29/04)
      • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames Androcles (07/29/04)
      • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames JM Albuquerque (07/29/04)
      • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames Richard Henry (07/29/04)
      • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames JM Albuquerque (07/29/04)
      • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames crynwulf (07/29/04)
      • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames Tom Roberts (07/29/04)
      • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames JM Albuquerque (07/29/04)
      • Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames Tom Roberts (07/28/04)
• Universe!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!....................... ... Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (07/26/04)
  • Re: Universe!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!....................... ... Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (07/26/04)
    • Re: Universe!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!....................... ... Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (07/26/04)
• How to calculate EXtrinsic curvature? Arun Madhav (07/26/04)
  • Re: How to calculate EXtrinsic curvature? davidoff404 (07/27/04)
  • Re: How to calculate EXtrinsic curvature? Tom Roberts (07/27/04)
• Weyl Curvature, Mach's Principle, and Heisenberg Uncertainty? Russell E. Rierson (07/26/04)
  • Re: Weyl Curvature, Mach's Principle, and Heisenberg Uncertainty? Russell E. Rierson (07/27/04)
  • Re: Weyl Curvature, Mach's Principle, and Heisenberg Uncertainty? Tom Roberts (07/28/04)
• Gravity? dh_ld_at_nomail.com (07/26/04)
  • Re: Gravity? Herman Family (07/26/04)
  • Re: Gravity? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (07/26/04)
    • Re: Gravity? DaveL (07/26/04)
      • Re: Gravity? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (07/26/04)
      • Re: Gravity? DaveL (07/26/04)
  • Re: Gravity? Paul Stowe (07/26/04)
    • Re: Gravity? Dirk Van de moortel (07/26/04)
      • Re: Gravity? Paul Stowe (07/27/04)
      • Re: Gravity? Dirk Van de moortel (07/27/04)
  • Re: Gravity? Pmb (07/26/04)
  • Re: Gravity? ted holden (07/26/04)
  • Re: Gravity? Androcles (07/26/04)
  • Re: Gravity? Bill Hobba (07/26/04)
  • Re: Gravity? Hagar (07/26/04)
    • Re: Gravity? QV (07/26/04)
      • Re: Gravity? Ole D. Rughede (07/27/04)
  • Re: Gravity? V ertner Vergon (07/26/04)
    • Re: Gravity? DaveL (07/27/04)
      • Re: Gravity? Greg Neill (07/27/04)
      • Re: Gravity? DaveL (07/27/04)
      • Re: Gravity? Greg Neill (07/27/04)
      • Re: Gravity? PeteM (07/27/04)
      • Re: Gravity? Creighton Hogg (07/27/04)
      • Re: Gravity? Greg Neill (07/27/04)
      • Re: Gravity? Magneto (07/28/04)
      • Re: Gravity? Greg Neill (07/28/04)
      • Re: Gravity? Ole D. Rughede (07/28/04)
      • Re: Gravity? Greg Neill (07/28/04)
      • Re: Gravity? Ole D. Rughede (07/28/04)
      • Re: Gravity? Greg Neill (07/28/04)
      • Re: Gravity? Ole D. Rughede (07/28/04)
      • Re: Gravity? Greg Neill (07/29/04)
      • Re: Gravity? Magneto (07/29/04)
      • Re: Gravity? Greg Neill (07/29/04)
      • Re: Gravity? Ole D. Rughede (07/29/04)
      • Re: Gravity? Greg Neill (07/30/04)
      • Re: Gravity? Androcles (07/30/04)
      • Re: Gravity? Ole D. Rughede (07/29/04)
      • Re: Gravity? DaveL (07/28/04)
      • Re: Gravity? V ertner Vergon (07/29/04)
      • Re: Gravity? Magneto (07/29/04)
      • Re: Gravity? Ole D. Rughede (07/28/04)
      • Re: Gravity? Donald G. Shead (07/29/04)
      • Re: Gravity? Ole D. Rughede (07/29/04)
      • Re: Gravity? V ertner Vergon (07/29/04)
      • Re: Gravity? Daniel G. Emilio (07/29/04)
  • Re: Gravity? Michael Gray (07/27/04)
    • Re: Gravity? Ole D. Rughede (07/27/04)
      • Re: Gravity? Magneto (07/28/04)
• Okay, SMITHSONIAN, Match THIS!!!!! Ed Conrad (07/26/04)
  • Re: Okay, SMITHSONIAN, Match THIS!!!!! Bill Hobba (07/26/04)
  • Re: Okay, SMITHSONIAN, Match THIS!!!!! The Ghost In The Machine (07/27/04)
• Re: Science and Opinion!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!................. ... ueb (07/25/04)
• Gravity and Magnetism Peter K. (07/25/04)
  • Re: Gravity and Magnetism Andr? Michaud (07/26/04)
  • Re: Gravity and Magnetism Eric Gisse (07/26/04)
    • Re: Gravity and Magnetism Paul Cardinale (07/27/04)
• TECCS Peter Kinane (07/25/04)
  • Re: TECCS Androcles (07/26/04)
  • Re: TECCS Peter Kinane (07/26/04)
  • Re: TECCS Peter Kinane (07/26/04)
  • Re: TECCS Peter Kinane (07/26/04)
• GR17 update davidoff404 (07/25/04)
  • Re: GR17 update Bruce Scott TOK (07/26/04)
  • Re: GR17 update Sam Wormley (07/26/04)
• Roger Penrose at GR 17 Jack Sarfatti (07/25/04)
  • Re: Roger Penrose at GR 17 Uncle Al (07/25/04)
• Gravity question Jure Sah (07/25/04)
  • Re: Gravity question Nick (07/25/04)
  • Re: Gravity question N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (07/25/04)
    • Re: Gravity question Dirk Van de moortel (07/25/04)
      • Re: Gravity question N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (07/25/04)
  • Re: Gravity question Jim Black (07/25/04)
    • Re: Gravity question Nick (07/25/04)
      • Re: Gravity question Jure Sah (07/25/04)
      • Re: Gravity question N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (07/26/04)
      • Re: Gravity question Mark Palenik (07/26/04)
      • Re: Gravity question Nick (07/26/04)
      • Re: Gravity question DaveL (07/26/04)
      • Re: Gravity question Androcles (07/26/04)
      • Re: Gravity question Mark Palenik (07/27/04)
      • Re: Gravity question Jim Black (07/26/04)
  • Re: Gravity question xxein (07/25/04)
  • Re: Gravity question John C. Polasek (07/26/04)
    • Re: Gravity question Nick (07/26/04)
      • Re: Gravity question Mark Palenik (07/27/04)
• Re: What If nightbat (07/25/04)
• Science & Creationists!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.................. ... Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (07/25/04)
• Theory of the Universe!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!................. ... Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (07/25/04)
• Re: The Nature of Mass Shooter (07/25/04)
  • Re: The Nature of Mass Androcles (07/25/04)
  • Re: The Nature of Mass cherring17 (07/26/04)
    • Re: The Nature of Mass Nick (07/26/04)
• Re: Re:76V@s*+2z(%q.w%f$e,[9o=Wvs.$^$O)? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (07/25/04)
  • Re: Re:76V@s*+2z(%q.w%f$e,[9o=Wvs.$^$O)? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (07/25/04)
    • Re: Re:76V@s*+2z(%q.w%f$e,[9o=Wvs.$^$O)? Harry (07/26/04)
      • Re: Re:76V@s*+2z(%q.w%f$e,[9o=Wvs.$^$O)? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (07/27/04)
• Re: The 7 Views making Gravity possibly Magnetism Eric Gisse (07/25/04)
• Earth's stronger magnetism attracts smaller objects = Gravity Peter K. (07/24/04)
  • Re: Earth's stronger magnetism attracts smaller objects = Gravity Peter K. (07/25/04)
  • Re: Earth's stronger magnetism attracts smaller objects = Gravity Eric Gisse (07/25/04)
• Earth's equal Magnetism orbits planets and sun Peter K. (07/24/04)
  • Re: Earth's equal Magnetism orbits planets and sun Eric Gisse (07/25/04)
• Einstein's ether maybe a modulated alpha wave Peter K. (07/24/04)
  • Re: Einstein's ether maybe a modulated alpha wave Robert J. Kolker (07/24/04)
    • Re: Einstein's ether maybe a modulated alpha wave Peter K. (07/25/04)
  • Re: Einstein's ether maybe a modulated alpha wave Androcles (07/24/04)
    • Re: Einstein's ether maybe a modulated alpha wave Peter K. (07/25/04)
      • Re: Einstein's ether maybe a modulated alpha wave Androcles (07/25/04)
      • Re: Einstein's ether maybe a modulated alpha wave Peter K. (07/25/04)
      • Re: Einstein's ether maybe a modulated alpha wave Androcles (07/26/04)
  • Re: Einstein's ether maybe a modulated alpha wave Bilge (07/25/04)
    • Re: Einstein's ether maybe a modulated alpha wave Peter K. (07/25/04)
  • Re: Einstein's ether maybe a modulated alpha wave Nick (07/25/04)
    • Re: Einstein's ether maybe a modulated alpha wave Ole D. Rughede (07/29/04)
  • Re: Einstein's ether maybe a modulated alpha wave Eric Gisse (07/25/04)
• The 8th View making Gravity possibly Magnetism Peter K. (07/24/04)
  • Re: The 8th View making Gravity possibly Magnetism Nick (07/25/04)
    • Re: The 8th View making Gravity possibly Magnetism Nick (07/25/04)
  • Re: The 8th View making Gravity possibly Magnetism Eric Gisse (07/25/04)
• Dark matter, dark energy, and will the acceleration reverse? Wantthatthing (07/24/04)
  • Re: Dark matter, dark energy, and will the acceleration reverse? Australopithecus Afarensis (07/25/04)
    • Re: Dark matter, dark energy, and will the acceleration reverse? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (07/25/04)
      • Re: Dark matter, dark energy, and will the acceleration reverse? Bill Hobba (07/25/04)
      • Re: Dark matter, dark energy, and will the acceleration reverse? Australopithecus Afarensis (07/25/04)
      • Re: Dark matter, dark energy, and will the acceleration reverse? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (07/25/04)
      • Re: Dark matter, dark energy, and will the acceleration reverse? Australopithecus Afarensis (07/25/04)
      • Re: Dark matter, dark energy, and will the acceleration reverse? N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (07/26/04)
• Re: Collection of Prejudices!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.............. ... ueb (07/24/04)
  • Re: Collection of Prejudices!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.............. ... ueb (07/25/04)
  • Re: Collection of Prejudices!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.............. ... ueb (07/26/04)
• Translate words "warp drive" into russian language Dmitry S. Kravchenko (07/24/04)
  • Re: Translate words "warp drive" into russian language Androcles (07/24/04)
    • Re: Translate words "warp drive" into russian language Alan Anderson (07/25/04)
      • Re: Translate words "warp drive" into russian language Androcles (07/25/04)
    • Re: Translate words "warp drive" into russian language Eric Gisse (07/25/04)
  • Re: Translate words "warp drive" into russian language shuba (07/24/04)
    • Re: Translate words "warp drive" into russian language Robert J. Kolker (07/24/04)
      • Re: Translate words "warp drive" into russian language shuba (07/25/04)
  • Re: Translate words "warp drive" into russian language Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (07/24/04)
  • Re: Translate words "warp drive" into russian language Shooter (07/25/04)
• Orthodoxy's Opposition to Theories of Superluminality Perfectly Innocent (07/24/04)
  • Re: Orthodoxy's Opposition to Theories of Superluminality Spaceman (07/24/04)
  • Re: Orthodoxy's Opposition to Theories of Superluminality Sam Wormley (07/24/04)
    • Re: Orthodoxy's Opposition to Theories of Superluminality Perfectly Innocent (07/24/04)
      • Re: Orthodoxy's Opposition to Theories of Superluminality Sam Wormley (07/24/04)
      • Re: Orthodoxy's Opposition to Theories of Superluminality Dirk Van de moortel (07/24/04)
  • Re: Orthodoxy's Opposition to Theories of Superluminality Perfectly Innocent (07/24/04)
  • Re: Orthodoxy's Opposition to Theories of Superluminality Uncle Al (07/24/04)
    • Re: Orthodoxy's Opposition to Theories of Superluminality Dave (07/24/04)
  • Re: Orthodoxy's Opposition to Theories of Superluminality Bilge (07/25/04)
    • Re: Orthodoxy's Opposition to Theories of Superluminality Perfectly Innocent (07/25/04)
      • Re: Orthodoxy's Opposition to Theories of Superluminality Bilge (07/26/04)
      • Re: Orthodoxy's Opposition to Theories of Superluminality Perfectly Innocent (07/26/04)
      • Re: Orthodoxy's Opposition to Theories of Superluminality Bilge (07/26/04)
      • Re: Orthodoxy's Opposition to Theories of Superluminality Perfectly Innocent (07/27/04)
      • Re: Orthodoxy's Opposition to Theories of Superluminality Bilge (07/27/04)
      • Re: Orthodoxy's Opposition to Theories of Superluminality Perfectly Innocent (07/27/04)
      • Re: Orthodoxy's Opposition to Theories of Superluminality Bilge (07/28/04)
    • Re: Orthodoxy's Opposition to Theories of Superluminality Perfectly Innocent (07/26/04)
      • Re: Orthodoxy's Opposition to Theories of Superluminality Bilge (07/26/04)
  • Re: Orthodoxy's Opposition to Theories of Superluminality Perfectly Innocent (07/25/04)
    • Re: Orthodoxy's Opposition to Theories of Superluminality Dirk Van de moortel (07/25/04)
      • Re: Orthodoxy's Opposition to Theories of Superluminality Robert J. Kolker (07/25/04)
      • Re: Orthodoxy's Opposition to Theories of Superluminality Dirk Van de moortel (07/25/04)
      • Re: Orthodoxy's Opposition to Theories of Superluminality Bilge (07/26/04)
    • Re: Orthodoxy's Opposition to Theories of Superluminality Sam Wormley (07/25/04)
  • Re: Orthodoxy's Opposition to Theories of Superluminality Perfectly Innocent (07/25/04)
    • Re: Orthodoxy's Opposition to Theories of Superluminality Sam Wormley (07/25/04)
  • Re: Orthodoxy's Opposition to Theories of Superluminality Perfectly Innocent (07/26/04)
• Difficulties with relativity, answer to Harry joseph levy (07/23/04)
  • Re: Difficulties with relativity, answer to Harry Bill Hobba (07/23/04)
• Modified Newtonian Dynamics and expansion of universe alistair (07/23/04)
• do photons interact with gravitons? Jefferson Trimble (07/23/04)
  • Re: do photons interact with gravitons? Creighton Hogg (07/23/04)
• THE GENERAL SCIENCE JOURNAL -- VERGON V ertner Vergon (07/23/04)
• Re: Do Virtual Photons Exist? Daniel Weston (07/23/04)
  • Re: Do Virtual Photons Exist? Androcles (07/23/04)
    • Re: Do Virtual Photons Exist? Daniel Weston (07/24/04)
      • Re: Do Virtual Photons Exist? Androcles (07/24/04)
    • Re: Do Virtual Photons Exist? Bilge (07/25/04)
  • Re: Do Virtual Photons Exist? Bilge (07/25/04)
    • Re: Do Virtual Photons Exist? shuba (07/26/04)
• Controversy over Twin Paradox Amol (07/23/04)
  • Re: Controversy over Twin Paradox Dirk Van de moortel (07/23/04)
    • Re: Controversy over Twin Paradox Oriel36 (07/23/04)
    • Re: Controversy over Twin Paradox V ertner Vergon (07/23/04)
      • Re: Controversy over Twin Paradox Dirk Van de moortel (07/23/04)
    • Re: Controversy over Twin Paradox César Sirvent (07/23/04)
  • Re: Controversy over Twin Paradox Androcles (07/23/04)
    • Re: Controversy over Twin Paradox Pentcho Valev (07/26/04)
      • Re: Controversy over Twin Paradox Dirk Van de moortel (07/26/04)
      • Re: Controversy over Twin Paradox Harry (07/26/04)
      • Re: Controversy over Twin Paradox Androcles (07/26/04)
      • Re: Controversy over Twin Paradox Pentcho Valev (07/27/04)
      • Re: Controversy over Twin Paradox Harry (07/27/04)
      • Re: Controversy over Twin Paradox Androcles (07/26/04)
  • Re: Controversy over Twin Paradox Paul Cardinale (07/23/04)
    • Re: Controversy over Twin Paradox César Sirvent (07/23/04)
  • Re: Controversy over Twin Paradox Jon Bell (07/24/04)
    • Re: Controversy over Twin Paradox Jon Bell (07/24/04)
    • Re: Controversy over Twin Paradox Dirk Van de moortel (07/24/04)
      • Re: Controversy over Twin Paradox Jon Bell (07/24/04)
      • Re: Controversy over Twin Paradox Dirk Van de moortel (07/25/04)
    • Re: Controversy over Twin Paradox Jon Bell (07/25/04)
      • Re: Controversy over Twin Paradox Jon Bell (07/25/04)
  • Re: Controversy over Twin Paradox Harry (07/24/04)
    • Re: Controversy over Twin Paradox Androcles (07/24/04)
      • Re: Controversy over Twin Paradox Harry (07/26/04)
      • Re: Controversy over Twin Paradox Androcles (07/26/04)
      • Re: Controversy over Twin Paradox Dirk Van de moortel (07/26/04)
  • Re: Controversy over Twin Paradox Gerald L. O'Barr (07/26/04)
• Quantum Phase Compactification via Spacetime Expansion Russell E. Rierson (07/23/04)
  • Re: Quantum Phase Compactification via Spacetime Expansion |-|erc (07/23/04)
    • Re: Quantum Phase Compactification via Spacetime Expansion Russell E. Rierson (07/24/04)
      • Re: Quantum Phase Compactification via Spacetime Expansion Loogie (07/24/04)
    • Re: Quantum Phase Compactification via Spacetime Expansion Russell E. Rierson (07/24/04)
  • Re: Quantum Phase Compactification via Spacetime Expansion Uncle Al (07/23/04)
    • Re: Quantum Phase Compactification via Spacetime Expansion Russell E. Rierson (07/23/04)
      • Re: Quantum Phase Compactification via Spacetime Expansion Uncle Al (07/23/04)
      • Re: Quantum Phase Compactification via Spacetime Expansion |-|erc (07/24/04)
      • Re: Quantum Phase Compactification via Spacetime Expansion Russell E. Rierson (07/24/04)
      • Re: Quantum Phase Compactification via Spacetime Expansion Loogie (07/24/04)
    • Re: Quantum Phase Compactification via Spacetime Expansion Edward Green (07/24/04)
  • Re: Quantum Phase Compactification via Spacetime Expansion Russell E. Rierson (07/24/04)
  • Re: Quantum Phase Compactification via Spacetime Expansion Russell E. Rierson (07/25/04)
  • Re: Quantum Phase Compactification via Spacetime Expansion Russell E. Rierson (07/26/04)
    • Re: Quantum Phase Compactification via Spacetime Expansion Uncle Al (07/26/04)
      • Re: Quantum Phase Compactification via Spacetime Expansion Russell E. Rierson (07/27/04)
      • Re: Quantum Phase Compactification via Spacetime Expansion Russell E. Rierson (07/27/04)
• Mercury's Orbit of Advance Calculated by Einstein Australopithecus Afarensis (07/23/04)
  • Re: Mercury's Orbit of Advance Calculated by Einstein Bill Hobba (07/23/04)
  • Re: Mercury's Orbit of Advance Calculated by Einstein greywolf42 (07/23/04)
    • Re: Mercury's Orbit of Advance Calculated by Einstein Australopithecus Afarensis (07/24/04)
      • Re: Mercury's Orbit of Advance Calculated by Einstein Spagley (07/25/04)
      • Re: Mercury's Orbit of Advance Calculated by Einstein Australopithecus Afarensis (07/25/04)
      • Re: Mercury's Orbit of Advance Calculated by Einstein Dirk Van de moortel (07/25/04)
      • Re: Mercury's Orbit of Advance Calculated by Einstein Australopithecus Afarensis (07/27/04)
      • Re: Mercury's Orbit of Advance Calculated by Einstein greywolf42 (07/27/04)
      • Re: Mercury's Orbit of Advance Calculated by Einstein greywolf42 (07/26/04)
    • Re: Mercury's Orbit of Advance Calculated by Einstein Bill Hobba (07/25/04)
      • Re: Mercury's Orbit of Advance Calculated by Einstein Dirk Van de moortel (07/25/04)
      • Re: Mercury's Orbit of Advance Calculated by Einstein greywolf42 (07/26/04)
      • Re: Mercury's Orbit of Advance Calculated by Einstein greywolf42 (07/26/04)
• Nuclear Gravitation Field Theory by KFW cherring17 (07/23/04)
• Characteristic Impedance for John Kennaugh/nTaul Andersen Androcles (07/23/04)
  • Re: Characteristic Impedance for John Kennaugh/nTaul Andersen Paul B. Andersen (07/23/04)
    • Re: Characteristic Impedance for John Kennaugh/nTaul Andersen Androcles (07/23/04)
• Could gravity prec