Re: Each increase in Amplitude Modulation steals a neighboring frequency
From: Dave (noone_at_nowhere.com)
Date: 07/10/04
- Next message: Dave: "Re: Each increase in Amplitude Modulation steals a neighboring frequency"
- Previous message: Bilge: "Re: Each increase in Amplitude Modulation steals a neighboring frequency"
- In reply to: Peter K.: "Re: Each increase in Amplitude Modulation steals a neighboring frequency"
- Next in thread: Peter K.: "Re: Each increase in Amplitude Modulation steals a neighboring frequency"
- Reply: Peter K.: "Re: Each increase in Amplitude Modulation steals a neighboring frequency"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 18:01:23 -0000
"Peter K." <guskz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:7f35df4b.0407100938.302ff308@posting.google.com...
> "Dave" <noone@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:<MO-dnQU1UZmUdXPdRVn-hw@crocker.com>...
> > "Peter K." <guskz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:7f35df4b.0407090835.1b655e01@posting.google.com...
> > > "Dave" <noone@nowhere.com> wrote in message
> > news:<ZqqdnULmorbt6HPdRVn-ug@crocker.com>...
> > > > "Peter K." <guskz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > > > news:7f35df4b.0407082200.2eca7f6f@posting.google.com...
> > > > > "Dave" <noone@nowhere.com> wrote in message
> > news:<XIGdnXcK_sL0OXDd4p2dnA@crocker.com>...
> > > > > > "Peter K." <guskz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > > > > > news:7f35df4b.0407080626.15cc4dab@posting.google.com...
> > > > > > > "Dave" <noone@nowhere.com> wrote in message
> > news:<sOudne2mxvsnGnHd4p2dnA@crocker.com>...
> > > > > > > > "Peter K." <guskz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > > > > > > > news:7f35df4b.0407062200.31218ee0@posting.google.com...
> > > > > > > > > "Dave" <noone@nowhere.com> wrote in message
> > news:<G5Cdnfiz6PraG3fdRVn-hg@crocker.com>...
> > > > > > > > > > wrong. just plain wrong. and not even on topic for
this
> > group
> > to
> > > > > > make
> > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > > > even worse.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Not even on topic.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Electro-magnetic waves have nothing to do with Relativity.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > You even dare to pretend you have a capability to
understand.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > i understand that the post is about bandwidth and
information
> > transfer.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Then Understand not the ape to man evolution theory but that
all
> > > > > > > existance including yourself is electricity and the
information
> > > > > > > thereof.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Only difference between each type of matter in the Universe is
one
> > > > > > > more or less electron, proton.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Light is an electro-magnetic wave
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Information goes to the eye of the viewer to explain
relativity
> > and
> > > > > > > twin paradox.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > electro-magnetic wave restricted to 1 or 0 without interfering
> > with
> > > > > > > the information or logic (or logic structure) of other
> > waves/matter.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Binary yes or no, conduction or insulation, matter or void,
> > > > > > > permittivity/conductivity or restriction/insulation.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Permittivity controls the curvature of SPACETIME.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > AN electron's energy will direct (CURVE) itself towards the
more
> > > > > > > permissible medium, meanwhile still emiting an AURA (CURVED
SPACE
> > of
> > > > > > > Gravity, Magnetism, and Spacetime) of itself in the opposite
> > directon
> > > > > > > of the least permissible medium (AKA Restriction and
insulation)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > what a blast of gibberish. how do you manage to put together
such
> > an
> > > > > > incoherent set of garbage??? and so far off of the original
posting
> > topic.
> > > > > > you really should create a new thread you know if you are going
to
> > change
> > > > > > the topic this much.
> > > > >
> > > > > You even dare to pretend you have a capability to understand
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 1. Two mediums: An electron will move (CURVE) towards the medium
with
> > > > > the highest permittivity (Curved Spacetime)
> > > > >
> > > > > 2. 2nd Medium with lowest permittivity is similar to insulation
(no
> > > > > conduction or travel).
> > > > >
> > > > > Conduction and insulation = 1 and 0 = digital universe. Amplitude
> > > > > Modulation proves that all analog waves are indeed also digital
(as
> > > > > previously explained).
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Pretend heat is traveling in pipe opening (opening is 1st medium)
but
> > > > > pipe is made of non-burnable fiberglass insulation (2nd medium).
> > > > >
> > > > > Section the insulation and the walls' inner pipe walls are hotter
and
> > > > > progressively cooler this is a Round thermal AURA which is similar
to
> > > > > gravity's curvature in space: Earth is the 1st medium has higher
> > > > > permittivity than Space (2nd medium). Gravity therefore generates
an
> > > > > Aura in Space.
> > > > >
> > > > > You'll never understand.
> > > >
> > > > you're right. i'll never understand why you abuse the purpose of
the
> > group
> > > > and post meaningless and downright erroneous claims that don't even
> > belong
> > > > here. maybe try posting to alt.sci.kooks or some other group where
your
> > > > stuff may be on topic.
> > >
> > > You'll never understand and alt.sci.kooks maybe of more interest to
> > > you.
> > >
> > > So *FORGET* about modulation.
> > >
> > > With what little understanding perhaps you may perserve these only 2:
> > >
> > >
> > > 1. A closed circuit with copper wire, remove a small section of wire
> > > and there's no conduction through space because the copper medium has
> > > a higher permittivity then the space medium (in regards to electrons).
> > >
> > > 2. The Earth has a higher permittivity than space explains Gravity's
> > > curvature (AURA). Likewise for metal and magnetism.
> >
> > i have forgotten more about modulation than you ever knew. and even
your
> > conductor/insulator analogy is off topic here, likewise your faulty
gravity
> > and magnitism junk... if you really need to post this type of junk
maybe
> > try alt.sci.physics.new-theories... they like oddball stuff there.
>
> You don't give up do you?
>
> 1. A battery surrounded by a flat plate of copper, the paths (FIELD)
> of the electrons on the plate of copper *CURVE* (WARP) from the "+" to
> "-" battery terminals in the *EXACT* shape as a MAGNETIC FIELD.
>
> 2. An electron moving in a copper wire, *also* conducts into space
> surrounding the wire but much less (space has a *lower* permittivity
> than copper): this semi-conduction generates an AURA (globule) around
> the copper wire known as *Magnetism*.
>
> Gravity (electromagnetic) and sound both waves and both strength
> reduce by inverse the distance squared.
>
> -------------------------------------
>
> 1. Gravity is exactly like (#1 above) electrons and magnetism. Science
> has only recently discovered quarks.
>
> 2. Unlike small mass, Gravity has a North and South Poles whose
> transmission moves (CURVES) from the North to South Poles.
>
> 3. Gravity attracts all mass, like magnetism attracts non-magnetised
> metal.
>
> 4. The difference between Gravity and magnetism is mostly their flux
> and similar to Radio and Microwaves (Radio passes through metal,
> Microwaves bounce off metal and yet both are electromagnetic waves but
> of different frequency).
>
> 5. Gravity maybe different then regular mass through it's infernal hot
> molten iron core which can generate induction fields within a planet
> (Same way as electricity can magnetise regular metal).
oh, you want me to give up? why didn't you say so? your stuff is getting
more and more off the wall as you try to make up more of it to impress me
anyway. and even you have strayed completely away from your original off
topic thread... so now you are off your own off topic.
- Next message: Dave: "Re: Each increase in Amplitude Modulation steals a neighboring frequency"
- Previous message: Bilge: "Re: Each increase in Amplitude Modulation steals a neighboring frequency"
- In reply to: Peter K.: "Re: Each increase in Amplitude Modulation steals a neighboring frequency"
- Next in thread: Peter K.: "Re: Each increase in Amplitude Modulation steals a neighboring frequency"
- Reply: Peter K.: "Re: Each increase in Amplitude Modulation steals a neighboring frequency"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|