Light & Matter:Two Modes of the Same Thing.

From: V ertner Vergon (vergon_enterprises_at_highstream.net)
Date: 07/11/04 

Date: 11 Jul 2004 08:52:22 -0700

We have electrostatic fields -- and static magnetic fields.

What if the two pair up in a symbiotic relationship -- like
people, the farmer takes a wife.
 
We could call this pair an electromagnetic field. My, my,
how unusual.
 
Now what if you shake electrons and they send these EM
fields out to travel ballistically on their own through space, we could
call that "electromagnetic radiation"
(Oh, this is so novel, I can't believe it.)

What if these fields have mass. There have been experiments
that determine the upper limit mass of electric and
magnetic fields.
 
So these fields have mass and are pliable. Then we can
think of them as waves -- waves that have mass.

Now if you will look up "superposition" you will see how
waves group together to reinforce and cancel each other.
 
And if you will look up Gaussian waves you will see how
these waves form GROUP STANDIG WAVES (that have mass)
with sub-group waves traveling through back to front.
 
Is it surprising that group waves, having mass, would
act as particles and waves at the same time? The
more mass, the more particle-like.

So where's the mystery?

"Energy" is mass in motion. Every formula for energy
contains two -- and only two -- elements, mass and motion.
This is true for E = h nu because one of the absolute
dimensions of h is mass.

Momentum, of course, is mass in motion also. No mass,
no momentum.

Now we can regard the frequency number, n, of a photon
as containing n electromagnetic fields (Each EM field
being 1 HZ) The larger is n the more fields there are and
the more massive the photon. The more massive the photon,
the more energy and momentum it has and the more
particle-like it becomes.

I have determined theoretically the mass of 1 Hz:
7.3720385 x 10^-48 gr.(Call it m.)

The number of Hz times m gives the mass of the
photon -- call it m_p. m_p X c = momentum of the
photon = h nu/c -- and m_p X c^2 = E = h nu.
Note, the latter is of the form E = mc^2

Now here is what is important to note: Multiply m times
the frequency number of the electron, and you get the mass
of the electron.

Do the same with the proton and neutron and you get their
respective masses.

Thus we see that radiation and matter have the same base
composition.

As empirical proof we note that in pair production photons
turn into matter -- and of course matter turns into photons.

Relevant Pages

  • THE MEANING OF E = MC^2
    ... What if these fields have mass. ... Now we can regard the frequency, nu, of a photon as containing n ... the more energy and momentum it ... mass got started when a photon was observed to collide with an electron ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2
    ... What if these fields have mass. ... Now we can regard the frequency, nu, of a photon as containing n ... the more energy and momentum it ... mass got started when a photon was observed to collide with an electron ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2
    ... What if these fields have mass. ... Now we can regard the frequency, nu, of a photon as containing n ... the more energy and momentum it ... mass got started when a photon was observed to collide with an electron ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: SRs velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Evidence?
    ... >> The mass of the particle increases because it absorbs part of the RF ... To ascertain the frequency of the recoil photon we utilize ... almost twice the mass of the electron. ... after absorption is equal to the Lorentz transformation: ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: SRs velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Evidence?
    ... >> The mass of the particle increases because it absorbs part of the RF ... To ascertain the frequency of the recoil photon we utilize ... almost twice the mass of the electron. ... after absorption is equal to the Lorentz transformation: ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
Quantcast