Ree: Relativity's Binaric Universe
From: Peter K. (guskz_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 07/15/04
- Next message: Bilge: "Re: The Cost of Relativity"
- Previous message: Jim Greenfield: "Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Evidence?"
- Next in thread: Peter K.: "Re: Ree: Relativity's Binaric Universe"
- Reply: Peter K.: "Re: Ree: Relativity's Binaric Universe"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 14 Jul 2004 23:20:22 -0700
What is ment by acceleration (non constant velocity) interferes with
Relativity's Spacetimes measures (dimensions):
Is all constant laws of measurements are for Inertial Frames
(Invariant measures such as length, time, mass, and energy).
As soon as the Entire Frame is under acceleration (velocity variation)
the Frame is no longer considered Inertial.
> As Einstein's Relativity SPACETIME MEASURES receives INTERFERENCE
> during ACCELERATION meaning when the velocity is not constant
> (variable).
>
> As well through the recently thesis on AM/FM radio waves, it was
> deduced that AS WELL:
>
> As well as Acceleration Interference, Relatvity' SPACETIME MEASURES
> also receive INTERFERENCE during any Amplitude Variation/Modulation
> (any Intensity variation) and any Frequencny Variation.
>
> 1. This makes three INTERFERENCES: Velocity, Intensity, and Frequency
> Variations.
>
> 2. These Interferences suggest a Binaric Universe (all dimensions and
> their attributes can hold only 2 values each...same as two objects
> cannot hold the SAME LOCATION in space: Binaric = occupied or empty)
>
> AM/FM bandwidth interference suggest a Binaric Universe.
>
> Example: A new single Ram bit domain suddenly can hold 128 bits of
> information but by doing so PROPORTIONNALY steals it's neighboring
> bits domain capacity to hold information is what happens with AM/FM
> Radio...the more Amplitude Varies (modulates) in AM Radio the more it
> steals it's neighboring frequencies "spatial" domains capability to
> hold
> information.
>
> (Some argue that modulation is not "any variation" which is false
> since either Amplitude or Frequency must remain fixed (cannot varie
> ***at all***) or the reception will also receive interference (noise).
>
> Conclusion:
>
> All the Universe's Physics and all Relativity's Spacetime Dimensions
> should agree with the above since all matter is comprised of electrons
> and protons which disperse (or orbit) through the Universe as waves.
>
> 1. Excluding time these electrons and protons generate BINARIC 3
> dimensional SPATIAL DOMAINS of Space (and 4 dimensions for Spacetime).
>
> 2. And the Binaric nature of all Spacetime's dimensions is explained
> above as interference to Relativity's Spacetime MEASURES during
> Acceleration (Velocity
> variation), Intensity variation (Amplitude variation), and frequency
> variation (in AM/FM radio waves: the last two generate bandwidth
> nterference).
>
> 3. Similar to Ram memory, each SPATIAL DOMAIN of all of Spacetime's
> dimensions can only hold two values and therefore color which is also
> a frequency (of light) would demand (usurp/steal) more of Spacetime's
> SPATIAL DOMAINS (generate interference (steal) with neighboring
> spatial domains of Relativity's Spacetime dimensions).
- Next message: Bilge: "Re: The Cost of Relativity"
- Previous message: Jim Greenfield: "Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Evidence?"
- Next in thread: Peter K.: "Re: Ree: Relativity's Binaric Universe"
- Reply: Peter K.: "Re: Ree: Relativity's Binaric Universe"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|