Re: A call to George to do some philosophy

From: George Hammond (research137_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 07/21/04 

Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 14:06:05 GMT

"Kamerynn" <idon'tdoemail@sorry.com> wrote in message
news:10fs7v11tjejd3d@corp.supernews.com...
>
>
> George Hammond wrote:
>
> > GOD=G_uv INVISIBLE WORLD
> >
> >
> > "RELIGION" is founded on two major premises:
> >
> > 1. There is an invisible man called God.
> >
> > 2. There is an invisible world called Heaven
> > and God lives there.
> >
> > 3. Nominally, it is believed that the "invisible
> > world" is actually an invisible portion of
> > the real world; which we simply cannot see.
> >
> > The following discovery PROVES that this is true and
> > explains why, and calculates the precise location of
> > the "event horizon" which separates the visible world
> > from the invisible world.. i.e. the event horizon that
> > separates Heaven and Earth. It PROVES in other words,
> > that THERE IS AN INVISIBLE WORLD!
>
> Kam:
> To continue the same line of thinking from
> my other response: why should we believe that
> this invisible world is heaven? Do you simply
> define "heaven" and "God" in ways that guarantee
> their existence?

[Hammond]
Thanks... it's nice to have your serious attention
for a change.. even if only for the few fleeting
seconds that your attention span dictates.
  Your question:

  "Why should we believe this
  invisible world is heaven"

immediately demonstrates that you have not read (or
do not comprehend the theory). So.. given that, I simply
have to guess as to where to start explaining it to you.
   The answer is this: God is a perfect man. A perfect man
sees a perfect world, because the world is created by his
brain. A perfect brain creates a perfect world. Therefore,
the difference between the world as we know it, and the
perfect world (called Heaven) is in fact this "invisible
world" described above.
   Now before you go beserk and say "I don't understand it"
and "you haven't proved it"... let me remind you that you
actually have to READ a theory before you can know what it
is about. And furthermore.... let me inform you that
this is not "all theoretical deduction"... fact is, THOUSANDS
of scholars and theologians (psychologists and priests)
ALREADY KNOW about this "invisible world" and talk about it
day and night in their sermons and lectures.... it has been known
for THOUSANDS of years.. but could never be PROVED AND
SCIENTIFICALLY EXPLAINED, until HAMMOND came along and proved
it.

>
> > This is not a hypothesis, experimental Psychometry
> > data explained by axiomatic physics verifies this
> > result to 2-decimal point accuracy.
> >
> > FIRST OF ALL, it has now been discovered that the
> > equation GOD=G_uv means that birth and childhood
> > growth in PSYCHOMETRY SPACE is caused by a
> > BIG BANG expansion in CLASSICAL GRAVITY SPACE
> > (see my post "GOD=G_uv UNWIN EXPAINS BIRTH
> > on sci.physics.relativity 7-18-04)
>
> Kam:
> Again, it sounds like you're talking about
> something other than God.

[Hammond]
Correction... you means it "sounds to YOU" like
that... but again, that is merely an artifact of
your ignorance of the theory, not a defect in the
theory.

> If the equation
> "God=G_uv" *means that* "birth and childhood..."
> Then you aren't discussing the gods that others
> discuss.

[Hammond]
I certainly am. You have to remember that "others"
DO NOT ACTUALLY KNOW what God is, and are constrained
to simply repeat the parables and metaphors that the
few greats who have passed before them left as
instructions for them to learn. I AM THE ONLY ONE,
(having discovered and proved it scientifically)
who actually knows what GOD is. And it is easily
demonstrated, and IS DEMONSTRATED in my paper
(on my website) that the scientific explanation
CLEARLY BEYOND ALL QUESTION explains the "God" that
the theologians, and historians discuss in the vague
terms that they are able to do so.

> So, again, you should use a word other
> than "god" to refer to what you've discovered.

[Hammond]
No.. it just means that you are not able to challenge
a proven discovery without actually reading it and
understanding it. Sorry, there is no "royal road
to authority".

> >
> > GOD=G_uv starts at infinity at birth and then due
> > to a Hubble expansion of perceptual reality decreases
> > towards zero during childhood growth. If growth
> > followed the theoretical (genotypic) growth curve
> > G_uv would approach zero at age 18. However, because
> > the SECULAR TREND in human growth says that there is a
> > TERMINAL ADULT GROWTH DEFICIT in every one of us,
> > G_uv never reaches zero, in fact it reaches a terminal
> > value of about .15 (15% growth deficit). This
> > "terminal adult curvature of perceptual reality" is
> > called "GOD".
>
> Kam:
> Again, that isn't how most people use the word
> "god."

[Hammond]
YES IT IS. You're simply not aware of it, because
you haven't even read the discovery and have no idea
HOW the scientific discovery actually explains the
"God" that the 6 billion people are discussing.

> So, what you've proven isn't the existence
> of God, but of something that deserves its own name.

[Hammond]
WRONG. Sorry to prick you're balloon, and I can
appreciate your apprehension.

>
> I've snipped the rest of your post - I'd simply
> respond to it in the same manner anyway, as I would
> all of your posts. Do the philosophy - start with
> defining the important terms such as "god." Only
> then will posting to a phil. NG be at all relevant.
> Otherwise, those who post here will ignore you
> (or flame you, as I'm about to start doing again).
>

[Hammond]
Do whatever you wanna do, makes no difference to
me. 

--
============================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
============================================

Relevant Pages

  • Re: GOD=G_uv FOR IQs OVER 150
    ... is and how our lives would be better and closer to god if that organ was ... > stunted growth: Poor growth is the central physical ... > important manifestation is poor BRAIN GROWTH. ... This scientific discovery only ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: GOD=G_uv FOR IQs OVER 150
    ... The "Secular Trend" in human growth is the measurement ... hence it would seem logical to see that a Creator God has ... > Ironically I've told some people, years ago, that one day scientists would ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • EINSTEINS PROOF OF THE 12 GODS OF EGYPT
    ... George Hammond, MS Physics ... rightly comprehend the discovery of a Factor Analytic Proof ... PROOF OF GOD ... publication of the world's first bona fide Scientific Proof ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: GOD=G_uv versus JOHN ANKERBERG
    ... God is when people imagine certain things that do not correspond ... here, George. ... > and that is known to be the state of GROWTH ... > This discovery PROVED that the difference between ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: GOD=G_uv A CHRISTMAS MESSAGE
    ... George Hammond wrote: ... > This Christmas then, marks a MILESTONE in Christianity, ... God exists. ... > the discovery is simple, obvious, and compelling... ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)