Re: There is no gap between philosophy and physics - is belief evil?
From: Robert J. Kolker (robert_kolker_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 07/22/04
- Next message: Patrick Reany: "Re: Mileva Maric Einstein"
- Previous message: Sam Wormley: "Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Evidence?"
- In reply to: Bilge: "Re: There is no gap between philosophy and physics - is belief evil?"
- Next in thread: Bilge: "Re: There is no gap between philosophy and physics - is belief evil?"
- Reply: Bilge: "Re: There is no gap between philosophy and physics - is belief evil?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 13:19:54 GMT
Bilge wrote:
> Why are human theories not natural? Did humans originate in a
> different universe than this one?
Any human artifact must be created within nature. That is a truism.
However theories in and of themselves are not the nature they describe.
The Word is not the Thing. The Map is not the Territory.
The most a theory can do is model some of the observables of nature and
postulate hypothetical causes to account for them.
Bob Kolker
- Next message: Patrick Reany: "Re: Mileva Maric Einstein"
- Previous message: Sam Wormley: "Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Evidence?"
- In reply to: Bilge: "Re: There is no gap between philosophy and physics - is belief evil?"
- Next in thread: Bilge: "Re: There is no gap between philosophy and physics - is belief evil?"
- Reply: Bilge: "Re: There is no gap between philosophy and physics - is belief evil?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading