Re: There is no gap between philosophy and physics - is belief evil?
From: Kenneth Doyle (nobody_at_notmail.com)
Date: 07/22/04
- Next message: joseph levy: "Re: answer to unresolved questions"
- Previous message: Spaceman: "Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Evidence?"
- In reply to: Patrick Reany: "Re: There is no gap between philosophy and physics - is belief evil?"
- Next in thread: Bilge: "Re: There is no gap between philosophy and physics - is belief evil?"
- Reply: Bilge: "Re: There is no gap between philosophy and physics - is belief evil?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 22:27:31 GMT
reany@asu.edu (Patrick Reany) wrote in
news:844a1b64.0407221415.7dc1b444@posting.google.com:
>> >The most a theory can do is model some of the observables of nature
>> >and postulate hypothetical causes to account for them.
>>
>> In that case, the bible would have to considered a scientific
>> theory.
>
> I don't see the logic in that claim.
>
He seems to have forgotten that the hypothetical cause must be vulnerable
to falisfication by experiment.
-- CodeCutter - good, fast and cheap; pick two.
- Next message: joseph levy: "Re: answer to unresolved questions"
- Previous message: Spaceman: "Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Evidence?"
- In reply to: Patrick Reany: "Re: There is no gap between philosophy and physics - is belief evil?"
- Next in thread: Bilge: "Re: There is no gap between philosophy and physics - is belief evil?"
- Reply: Bilge: "Re: There is no gap between philosophy and physics - is belief evil?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]