Re: Controversy over Twin Paradox
From: Androcles (androc1es_at_nospamblueyonder.co.uk)
Date: 07/23/04
- Next message: Dirk Van de moortel: "Re: A binary star paradox"
- Previous message: Eric Gisse: "Re: Could gravity precisely be magnetism?"
- In reply to: Amol: "Controversy over Twin Paradox"
- Next in thread: Pentcho Valev: "Re: Controversy over Twin Paradox"
- Reply: Pentcho Valev: "Re: Controversy over Twin Paradox"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 13:30:28 GMT
"Amol" <amol12882@yahoo.co.in> wrote in message
news:c22a881.0407230153.15303e83@posting.google.com...
| According to that Twin Paradox, is one brother stayed at earth and
| other went to space with speed of light and he came back after some
| time then it seems that one who travels with spped of light ages less
| than who stayed at earth.
| In this case we are only considering the frame of refrence of earth
| i.e. w.r.to earth you are calculating the age of that person.
| Now suppose that you are in a space ship, then according to you, you
| are at rest and earth is moving with the spped of light.
| Here also the same logic can be applied and you will say that the
| person sitting on the earth will younger than you.
| Therfore the explanation can be given from both point of view, hence
| the age of both the persons should be same, because time is relative.
That's why it's called a paradox.
Any ideas how to solve it?
Androcles
- Next message: Dirk Van de moortel: "Re: A binary star paradox"
- Previous message: Eric Gisse: "Re: Could gravity precisely be magnetism?"
- In reply to: Amol: "Controversy over Twin Paradox"
- Next in thread: Pentcho Valev: "Re: Controversy over Twin Paradox"
- Reply: Pentcho Valev: "Re: Controversy over Twin Paradox"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|