Re: A call to George to do some philosophy

From: Kamerynn (idon'tdoemail_at_sorry.com)
Date: 07/24/04 

Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 19:08:45 -0600

George Hammond wrote:

>>>>>[Hammond]
>>>>>I certainly am. You have to remember that "others"
>>>>>DO NOT ACTUALLY KNOW what God is, and are constrained
>>>>>to simply repeat the parables and metaphors that the
>>>>>few greats who have passed before them left as
>>>>>instructions for them to learn. I AM THE ONLY ONE,
>>>>>(having discovered and proved it scientifically)
>>>>>who actually knows what GOD is.

Kam, in response to the above, wrote:

>> One last time, George. You have admitted,
>>above, that you don't agree with the account of
>>God given by the major religions.
>
>
> [Hammond]
> Quit your lying. And don't try to put words in my
> mouth... you're not big enough.

Kam:
      You stated that "others do not actually know
what God is" and "I [George] am the only one who
actually knows what God is." So, you've admitted
that you don't agree with the account of God
given in the world's major religions. Clear enough
for you, yet?

> [Hammond]
> You got that one right... least of all you.
> With all your collection of academic buzzwords
> does not cover an underlying aggravated and argumentative
> personality who is only interested in arguing
> for arguments sake...

Kam:
      You know nothing about me, George. I will
*not* pretend to know anything about you... but
I guess that's because I'm here to do some honest
philosophy while you are not.

> I can see the limits of your
> ability without even trying... and most of all you
> have NO SAVING GRACE in the form of an inquiring
> and exploratory attitude... in the first place you
> can't recognize a world class schola when you
> hear one speak and think you're talking to a run of the
> mill academic kook....

Kam:
      Wrong. I started off giving you a fair chance
to explain yourself, which you haven't done. I
don't believe that I'm talking to a kook so much
as to someone who doesn't understand the religious
notions of "God" - in places, you say that your
theory is consistent with religion and in other
places you contradict that.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: God=G_uv Comments of Isham Dembski Unwin
    ... > Oh comon Kam... ... part of reality and an actual invisible man. ... God is believed to have in fact created the universe, ... An analogy between invisibility in reality ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: GERMANY EYEBALLS S.P.O.G.
    ... >ecumenically unite the world's major Religions using the fact of ... >to unite the world's masses in a universal demand for international ... >peace, human rights and an end to exploitation of the innocent. ... >and the existence of God has now been proven. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: God=G_uv Comments of Isham Dembski Unwin
    ... >>have a sound argument for what God is, ... > Well ok Kam... ... > 3 The brain growth deficit controls reality hence God rules the world. ... Besides - I've already written about how analogy isn't ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: A call to George to do some philosophy
    ... > George Hammond wrote: ... > philosophy - in order to prove that God exists, ... > you must first state what God is. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: A call to George to do some philosophy
    ... > All existing proofs of God are known to be ... Kam: ... philosophy - in order to prove that God exists, ... and you say that he's caused by gravity. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)