Re: Quantum Phase Compactification via Spacetime Expansion
From: Russell E. Rierson (analog57_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 07/24/04
- Next message: Peter K.: "Re: Any explanation why we see three dimensions"
- Previous message: Paul Stowe: "Re: Aether is the empty space in which the Universe sits"
- In reply to: |-|erc: "Re: Quantum Phase Compactification via Spacetime Expansion"
- Next in thread: Uncle Al: "Re: Quantum Phase Compactification via Spacetime Expansion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 23 Jul 2004 23:03:57 -0700
"|-|erc" <gotch@beauty.com> wrote in message news:<9m6Mc.12799$K53.6224@news-server.bigpond.net.au>...
> what limits would be applied to
> > "event" density of entangled quantum states, continually increases
>
> would high level events that we describe semantically be 'physically demonstrated'?
>
> Herc
So if Einstein says that "the train arrives here at ten o'clock" he
means that the pointing of the small hand of his clock to the ten and
the arrival of the train are "simultaneous events"... where the clock
and the event, are in close proximity.
This definition of time appears to be OK when defining time for the
place where the clock is located, but it is insufficient for defining
time for a series of events at different locations, i.e. to evaluate
times of events occurring at locations remote from the clock.
If for a location A of space, there is a clock, with an observer, and
the observer at A can determine the time values of events in the
immediate proximity of A by observing the positions of the hands of
the clock which are simultaneous with the events at location A.
If at another location in space, point B, with an identical clock, the
observer at B can determine the time values in the immediate proximity
of B. But the time of an event at A cannot compare to the time of an
event at B since a common time for both A and B is yet to be defined.
According to Einstein, the time it takes a ray of light to travel from
A to B equals the time it takes the ray to travel from B to A. Let the
ray of light start at the A time "TA" from A to B, it arrives at the B
time "TB" and is reflected back in the direction of A, where it
arrives at the A time "T'A".
TB - TA = T'A - T'B
A "synchronous" definition of time is arrived at?
2AB/[T'A - TA] = c, the speed of light in vacuum.
Distance is a property between objects in space. Duration is a
distance between events in time. Spacetime is a relational structure;
The structure
of space is possibly a distributive lattice. A lattice is a
partially ordered set, closed under least upper and greatest lower
bounds.
The geometric view of physics means that the laws of physics are the
same in every Lorentz reference system. Local Lorentz invariance. But
since the universe has no exterior reference frame, and it must refer
to itself, its world line intersects with itself. This
quantized-evolution of spacetime dictated by GR and QM, means that the
world line of the past intersects with the world lines of the present,
for the universe. A geometric stacking of space like slices,
parameterized by t, The universe is a function of itself. Spacetime
becomes compressed. As the time evolution proceeds in the
thermodynamic direction of t, the space like sheets continually
increase in density. The information storage of space time.
(<-(->(<-(U)->)<-)->)
This increasing refractive spacetime density must be background
independent. The increasing density functions are, in a sense,
equivalent to the non-Euclidean geometry of Riemann and Einstein.
- Next message: Peter K.: "Re: Any explanation why we see three dimensions"
- Previous message: Paul Stowe: "Re: Aether is the empty space in which the Universe sits"
- In reply to: |-|erc: "Re: Quantum Phase Compactification via Spacetime Expansion"
- Next in thread: Uncle Al: "Re: Quantum Phase Compactification via Spacetime Expansion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]