Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Evidence?

From: Androcles (androc1es_at_nospamblueyonder.co.uk)
Date: 07/24/04 

Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 19:46:25 GMT

"Spaceman" <Spaceman@realspaceman.com> wrote in message
news:jAwMc.177835$Oq2.132240@attbi_s52...
|
| "Androcles" <androc1es@nospamblueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
| news:mkqMc.6736$hX3.68903157@news-text.cableinet.net...
| }
| } "Spaceman" <Spaceman@realspaceman.com> wrote in message
| } news:KcjMc.173123$XM6.147211@attbi_s53...
| } |
| } | "Androcles" <androc1es@nospamblueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
| } | news:YghMc.6573$SJ7.67229767@news-text.cableinet.net...
| } | } The point is,
| } | } "x' = x-vt" is preceded by "IF we place".
| } | } and later followed by
| } | } "From the origin of system k let a ray be emitted at the time tau0
along
| } the
| } | } X-axis to x',"
| } | } But as we see, the origin of system k and x' are one and the same.
x' =
| } 0.
| } | } The ray has zero distance to travel.
| } | } So
| } | }
| } | } 1/2 [1/(c-v) + 1/(c+v)]dtau/dt = dtau/dx' + 1/(c-v) dtau/dt
| } | }
| } | } contains a divide-by-zero in the term dtau/dx'.
| } | }
| } | } Of course this is only one of Einstein's blunders. Mathematician he
was
| } not.
| } |
| } | He was smart enough to hide all his errors in large equations.
| } | :)
| }
| } You can fool all the people some of the time (I was fooled for a long
time,
| } I admit it)
| } some of the people all of the time (relativists are still taken in by it
| } today)
| } but you cannot fool all of the people all of the time.
| }
| } When you know something is wrong, and many people have raised paradox
upon
| } paradox so we know something is wrong, the correct approach is to
| } investigate and locate the source of the problem, not try to patch up a
| } faulty theory that you want to believe in.
| } Einstein was either smart enough to produce a rabbit out of a hat on
paper
| } and the greatest mathemagician of all time, or idiot savant.
| } Consider:
| } a = b
| } ab = b^2 (multiply by b)
| } ab-a^2 = b^2-a^2 (subtract a^2)
| } a(b-a) = (b+a)(b-a) (factorize)
| } a = b+a (cancel b-a)
| } a = a+a (because b = a, given)
| } a = 2a (sum a+a)
| } 1=2 (divide by a)
| }
| } That isn't so very different from
| } c = (c+w)/(1+w/c) if we declare w = c.
| } 1 = (1+1)/(1+ 1/1).
| }
| } What do you do? Look for the blunder or accept 2 =1?
|
| All the morons have accepted the 2=1 sadly and will fight for it like
| it's a religion.
| :)
It IS a religion to them. So is aetherialism. The aetherialists are no
different, they simply cannot conceive light needs no aether to carry it.
Androcles