Re: GOD=G_uv HAMMOND NOBEL SPEECH
From: TMG (TMG_at_Nowhere.org)
Date: 07/25/04
- Next message: Paul Stowe: "Re: Aether is the empty space in which the Universe sits"
- Previous message: Bill Hobba: "Re: Aether is the empty space in which the Universe sits"
- In reply to: David Evens: "Re: GOD=G_uv HAMMOND NOBEL SPEECH"
- Next in thread: David Evens: "Re: GOD=G_uv HAMMOND NOBEL SPEECH"
- Reply: David Evens: "Re: GOD=G_uv HAMMOND NOBEL SPEECH"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 22:09:14 -0400
David Evens wrote:
> On 23 Jul 2004 19:29:24 GMT, danfoxart@NOSPAMyahoo.com(Dan Fox) wrote:
>
>>As a graduate physicist myself (M.S., WVU, 1971), I've looked over the
>>Hammond stuff and have a question: why do real physicists here bother with
>>this guy at all? He is clearly insane; his ideas aren't even bad science -
>>they are gibberish.
>
>
> Well, he's sane enough that they let him roam the streets .
Well, the Commonwealth DOES lock him up now and then. Even George admits
to taking a bit of a rest as a guest of our mental health system.
> He's also very, very funny to humiliate,
> although it tends to wear thin.
True, but then he finds some new way to piss everyone off!
> In any event, nobody posts here for work purposes, it's strictly
> recreational. Showing people a newly observered knot that George has
> tied himself into without noticing is amusing.
Hammond has an unusually wide blind spot. Even for a drooling crank,
he's totally wacked. Very much more than Archimedes Plutonium.
>>Here's one for you: when I was a freshman I found a little book in the
>>library by one Arthur Otis, PhD. It was a nonsensical refutation of general
>>relativity (Otis was dead serious). I actually found it on the web - if
>>you're interested in a taste go to
>>http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=61647071
>
>
> Reminds me of a video I saw once, in which a former geologist whose
> brain appeared to have gone soft went on about how this 300 foot high
> sheer limestone cliff was cut through lime mud by a river...
>
>
>>By the way, I looked at George Hammond's picture at his site. He looks so
>>... normal. Of course, so did Jeffrey Daumer.
>
>
> The picture Potty put on his site looks normal, too, except that
> there's no reason to ssuppose either picture is of the person it is
> claimed to be.
Actually - that's a reasonably accurate pic of George - it's a few years
old, and it lacks the cartoon stink-lines denoting his filthy homeless
status - but last I saw the great thinker, it was close.
- Next message: Paul Stowe: "Re: Aether is the empty space in which the Universe sits"
- Previous message: Bill Hobba: "Re: Aether is the empty space in which the Universe sits"
- In reply to: David Evens: "Re: GOD=G_uv HAMMOND NOBEL SPEECH"
- Next in thread: David Evens: "Re: GOD=G_uv HAMMOND NOBEL SPEECH"
- Reply: David Evens: "Re: GOD=G_uv HAMMOND NOBEL SPEECH"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|