Re: The difference in acceleration - About Gravity's Strength
From: Herman Family (celcaps_at_frontiernets.net/without_any_s/)
Date: 07/28/04
- Next message: Magneto: "Re: Gravity?"
- Previous message: Bilge: "Re: Is special relativity falsifiable?"
- In reply to: Mitchell: "The difference in acceleration - About Gravity's Strength"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 03:45:53 GMT
"Mitchell" <macromitch@internetCDS.com> wrote in message
news:9c3da975.0407271857.372c5d0e@posting.google.com...
> dcshead@charter.net (Donald G. Shead) wrote in message
news:<48402bae.0407261458.48523d1c@posting.google.com>...
> > I don't think anybody knows yet, the difference betweeen a change in
> > velocity [vt-vi], and a _rate_ of change in velocity [(vt-vi)/t]:
> >
>
> That is the difference between gravity and nongravitational acceleration.
> The strength of gravity in weight is an acceleration without any rate.
> When you remove the rate you are left with a more general definition
> of acceleration. Without the rate you only have a limited acceleration.
> It happens to be the constant we know as the speed of light.
> That is the limit is less than a light speed change in motion.
>
> The equivalence principle must become in this way more general.
> Nongravitational acceleration is unlimited due to the rate diminishing
indefinitely.
> So gravity's acceleration(weight) is more general.
> And the strength of gravity is limited.
> And there are no black holes.
>
> Thank you Donald for providing me the opertunity to pontificate.
>
> Mitch Raemsch
> -- Time moves --
LOL. It's rare to see such a nice satire of an obviously wrong statement.
Michael
- Next message: Magneto: "Re: Gravity?"
- Previous message: Bilge: "Re: Is special relativity falsifiable?"
- In reply to: Mitchell: "The difference in acceleration - About Gravity's Strength"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
