Re: Is special relativity falsifiable?

From: Dirk Van de moortel (dirkvandemoortel_at_ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com)
Date: 07/28/04


Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 11:11:58 +0200


"Marcel Luttgens" <mluttgens@wanadoo.fr> wrote in message news:86996cba.0407270441.1cddd0e0@posting.google.com...

  http://www.google.com/search?q=luttgens+site%3Ausers.pandora.be

Marcel Luttgens' home page:
   http://perso.wanadoo.fr/mluttgens/

"The Lorentz transformation (LT) are false":
   http://perso.wanadoo.fr/mluttgens/LTfalse.htm
   shot down in
     http://groups.google.com/groups?&threadm=b45b8808.0303270557.276fb4a@posting.google.com

"There is no length contraction"
   http://perso.wanadoo.fr/mluttgens/mmx.htm
   shot down in
     http://groups.google.com/groups?&threadm=b45b8808.0305140114.2499a771@posting.google.com

"The Twin paradox falsifies SR"
   http://perso.wanadoo.fr/mluttgens/twinpdx1.htm
   shot down in
     http://groups.google.com/groups?&threadm=20010905090646.22330.00000003@nso-cl.aol.com

"Newton vs Einstein"
   http://redshift.vif.com/JournalFiles/Pre2001/V05NO1PDF/V05n1lut.pdf

Dirk Vdm



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Chuck Yeager and the IAF
    ... it's -- contraction of it is ... I'll have to admit I wasn't an English major by a long shot, ...
    (rec.aviation.piloting)
  • Re: Chuck Yeager and the IAF
    ... it's -- contraction of it is ... I'll have to admit I wasn't an English major by a long shot, but isn't the word "possessive" spelled with two s's and not one? ...
    (rec.aviation.piloting)
  • Re: Chuck Yeager and the IAF
    ... it's -- contraction of it is ... I'll have to admit I wasn't an English major by a long shot, ...
    (rec.aviation.piloting)
  • Re: Chuck Yeager and the IAF
    ... it's -- contraction of it is ... I'll have to admit I wasn't an English major by a long shot, ...
    (rec.aviation.piloting)