Re: Gravity is a Continuum

From: ZZBunker (zzbunker_at_netscape.net)
Date: 07/30/04 

Date: 29 Jul 2004 23:32:29 -0700

Eric Gisse <fseggNOSPAM@uaf.edu> wrote in message news:<9ecjg0tcjg6os16j99r2tg6iv1bccao40q@4ax.com>...
> On 29 Jul 2004 17:37:16 -0700, macromitch@internetCDS.com (Mitchell)
> wrote:
>
> >Gravity is not a particle. Gravitons do not exists; only
> >a curved space-time continuum.
> >Mitch Raemsch
> > -- Light Falls in Gravity's Continuum --
>
> Idiot.
>
> Middleschool babble - like you, it means nothing to anyone except
> yourself.
>
> CRACK A FUCKING BOOK FOR ONCE IN YOUR LIFE
>
> "Gravitation" : Misner, Thorne, Wheeler
> "Introducing Einstein's Relatvitiy" : Ray D'Inverno
>
> I, personally, am sick of your mindless spewing about a subect that
> you know nothing about.

  Many people have read it. And are still curious
  where this philosophy about Hydrogen ignorami
  keep coming up with this non-sense about
  Einstonium, and "Einstein's" relivity.
  Since the boob is known to have been the
  most probability challenged mathemeta-wanker
  to have hit Earth, since the more moronic
  Chemist Fig Newton hit Earth.

  Gravity is like a particle only in the way
  Jesus was a like particle. Hair today,
  hair tomorrow, but gone quicker than
  a Jesuit can sign up for an El Dorado
  Bumber-to-Bumber Cruise Control
  Insurance Policy.