Re: Defining physics
From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect (ahmed.ouahi_at_welho.com)
Date: 07/30/04
- Next message: Franco: "Re: Science, Religion, Philosophy."
- Previous message: Marcel Luttgens: "Re: Is special relativity falsifiable?"
- In reply to: Patrick Reany: "Defining physics"
- Next in thread: Bilge: "Re: Defining physics"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 13:16:49 +0300
.............. ...Obviouslly, how it could be, when a generally along
the science. Naturally, everything basically it is a Physics, whether, it
would be -speculation- along the details which it does performs any
hypothesis. Simply however, for a subjective attempt to define as to see,
whether it could be a possible to determine any fact along any event.
............... ...Therefore, in that a crucial moment, any speculation
could be a just along a fastidious considerations of an any probabilities.
Which always and a definitely, a just a sneaking around. And in that, a
specific moment, especially along any attempt, the train would go on the
rails along which it has had always gone, a definitely as a matter a
fact!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!..................... ...
-- Ahmed Ouahi, Architect Best Regards! "Patrick Reany" <reany@asu.edu> wrote in message news:844a1b64.0407291602.6351e864@posting.google.com... > Speculation: Physics can be defined as that part of science for which > causation can never be proved and might be doable without causality > altogether. > > Patrick
- Next message: Franco: "Re: Science, Religion, Philosophy."
- Previous message: Marcel Luttgens: "Re: Is special relativity falsifiable?"
- In reply to: Patrick Reany: "Defining physics"
- Next in thread: Bilge: "Re: Defining physics"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|