Re: Gravity is a Continuum
From: Mitchell (macromitch_at_internetCDS.com)
Date: 07/30/04
- Next message: Androcles: "Re: Defining physics"
- Previous message: Albert: "Re: The Emptiness of Theology"
- In reply to: Uncle Al: "Re: Gravity is a Continuum"
- Next in thread: Eric Gisse: "Re: Gravity is a Continuum"
- Reply: Eric Gisse: "Re: Gravity is a Continuum"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 30 Jul 2004 12:23:08 -0700
Uncle Al <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message news:<41099C27.212BE189@hate.spam.net>...
> Mitchell wrote:
> >
> > Gravity is not a particle. Gravitons do not exists; only
> > a curved space-time continuum.
> > Mitch Raemsch
> > -- Light Falls in Gravity's Continuum --
>
>
> > Ignorant idiot. Affine gravitation has spacetime torsion not
> curvature. Its predictions are exactly identical to those of
> General Relativity qualitatively and quantitatively. In fact,
> affine gravitation is richer. What about Minkowski space,
> stooopid Raemsch? Hermann Minkowski was Einstein's math teacher
> at the Polytechnic Institute of Zurich. Do you know where Zurich
> is, Raemsch? It's east of Chicago.
>
So which is it? Does it curve or doesn't it? There is only one answer
to this question. It can't be both.
You missed the point Al: "Affine" gravitation is still a continuum.
Gravity is a continuum in motion = called the AETHER.
Mitch Raemsch
-- Gravity is a Continuum that Curves --
- Next message: Androcles: "Re: Defining physics"
- Previous message: Albert: "Re: The Emptiness of Theology"
- In reply to: Uncle Al: "Re: Gravity is a Continuum"
- Next in thread: Eric Gisse: "Re: Gravity is a Continuum"
- Reply: Eric Gisse: "Re: Gravity is a Continuum"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
