Re: Gravity is a Continuum

From: Eric Gisse (fseggNOSPAM_at_uaf.edu)
Date: 07/30/04 

Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 11:47:23 -0800

On 30 Jul 2004 12:23:08 -0700, macromitch@internetCDS.com (Mitchell)
wrote:

>Uncle Al <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message news:<41099C27.212BE189@hate.spam.net>...
>> Mitchell wrote:
>> >
>> > Gravity is not a particle. Gravitons do not exists; only
>> > a curved space-time continuum.
>> > Mitch Raemsch
>> > -- Light Falls in Gravity's Continuum --
>>
>>
>> > Ignorant idiot. Affine gravitation has spacetime torsion not
>> curvature. Its predictions are exactly identical to those of
>> General Relativity qualitatively and quantitatively. In fact,
>> affine gravitation is richer. What about Minkowski space,
>> stooopid Raemsch? Hermann Minkowski was Einstein's math teacher
>> at the Polytechnic Institute of Zurich. Do you know where Zurich
>> is, Raemsch? It's east of Chicago.
>>
>So which is it? Does it curve or doesn't it? There is only one answer
>to this question. It can't be both.
>You missed the point Al: "Affine" gravitation is still a continuum.
>Gravity is a continuum in motion = called the AETHER.

Iiiiidiiiiot.
>Mitch Raemsch
> -- Gravity is a Continuum that Curves --