Re: A challenge to non-SRians
From: Peter Kinane (pkinane_at_iol.ie)
Date: 07/30/04
- Next message: Sam Wormley: "Re: Gravity is a Continuum"
- Previous message: Bill Hobba: "Re: The origin of zombiism"
- In reply to: Peter Kinane: "Re: A challenge to non-SRians"
- Next in thread: Peter Kinane: "Re: A challenge to non-SRians"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 30 Jul 2004 16:48:43 -0700
"Peter Kinane" <pkinane@iol.ie> wrote in message news:d8097fcc.0407290408.1bae2b90@posting.google.com...
<snip>
'Nature' likes different frames of reference, 'Nature' likes
diversity. Value is relational and somewhat first person - not
relative and third party, as Einstein thought. So, accordingly, select
a FoR through trail and error and get on with business in a 'Nature'
friendly, coherent, intuitve fashion, and, if required, use clocks
which, like all things, change in accordance with the forces through
which they effect.
So, anyone, any ideas on how to employ this model to contrast with
relativity - and help to relieve the thread poster of his money, also
do Physics, indeed science, a favour?
Peter Kinane
http://www.effectuationism.com/forum/messages/27/27.html?1071620499
- Next message: Sam Wormley: "Re: Gravity is a Continuum"
- Previous message: Bill Hobba: "Re: The origin of zombiism"
- In reply to: Peter Kinane: "Re: A challenge to non-SRians"
- Next in thread: Peter Kinane: "Re: A challenge to non-SRians"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|