Re: Is special relativity falsifiable?
From: Tom Roberts (tjroberts_at_lucent.com)
Date: 07/31/04
- Next message: TMG: "Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 %"
- Previous message: Tom Roberts: "Re: the heart of a paradox"
- In reply to: Marcel Luttgens: "Is special relativity falsifiable?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2004 01:09:21 GMT
Marcel Luttgens wrote:
> As no inertial frame can be found in the Universe, no real (physical)
> experiment can falsify special relativity.
But SR is _KNOWN_ to not be valid for such a situation. So why beat a
dead horse?
> Aircrafts thought experiment: [...]
You attempt to spply SR outside its domain of applicability -- that's
invalid.
> Aplication to an expanding universe: [...]
You attempt to spply SR outside its domain of applicability -- that's
invalid.
>> From :Tom Roberts (tjroberts@lucent.com)
>> The "falsifiability criterium" is easily stated: make any measurement
>> within the domain of applicability of SR; if that measurement disagrees
>> significantly from the prediction of the theory, and if it can be
>> reliably and reproducably obtained, then the theory is falsified.
>>
>> To date, nobody has been able to do that for SR.
You haven't even begun.
Tom Roberts tjroberts@lucent.com
- Next message: TMG: "Re: GOD=G_uv BAYESIAN P=99.9 %"
- Previous message: Tom Roberts: "Re: the heart of a paradox"
- In reply to: Marcel Luttgens: "Is special relativity falsifiable?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]