Re: Gravity and Gravitation
From: Mike (eleatis_at_yahoo.gr)
Date: 08/03/04
- Next message: Androcles: "Re: black hole information loss?"
- Previous message: Androcles: "Re: self-study recommendations?"
- In reply to: Uncle Al: "Re: Gravity and Gravitation"
- Next in thread: Uncle Al: "Re: Gravity and Gravitation"
- Reply: Uncle Al: "Re: Gravity and Gravitation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 3 Aug 2004 01:04:27 -0700
Uncle Al <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message news:<410EC6E5.D79F5313@hate.spam.net>...
> "Gregory L. Hansen" wrote:
> >
> > In article <410E7F3F.F7C412BA@mchsi.com>,
> > Sam Wormley <swormley1@mchsi.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >Gravitation
> > > http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=gravitation
> > > The natural phenomenon of attraction between physical objects
> > > with mass or energy
> > >
> > >Gravity
> > > http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=gravity
> >
> > b.The natural force of attraction between any two massive bodies, which is
> > directly proportional to the product of their masses and inversely
> > proportional to the square of the distance between them.
> >
> > c.Gravitation.
> >
> > Looks like they're synonymous.
>
> No, stooopid. Thet is why you are a layman and are not fit to
> decide. Gravitation is normal to the surface. Now look up the
> proper technical definition of "gravity."
Hey fucking idiot uncle al. I wonder how you can propose experiments
without knowing the proper use of terms or even having them backwards.
Idiot, gravity is the effect of gravitation, or in other words, the
force of gravity (like weight) is described by the Law of Universal
Gravitation.
idiot. Go back producing zirkonian
Mike
- Next message: Androcles: "Re: black hole information loss?"
- Previous message: Androcles: "Re: self-study recommendations?"
- In reply to: Uncle Al: "Re: Gravity and Gravitation"
- Next in thread: Uncle Al: "Re: Gravity and Gravitation"
- Reply: Uncle Al: "Re: Gravity and Gravitation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]