Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames
From: Tom Roberts (tjroberts_at_lucent.com)
Date: 08/04/04
- Next message: vonroach: "Re: Is the universe spatially infinite?"
- Previous message: Eugene: "Re: Instantaneous spreading of relativistic wave packets does not contradict causality"
- In reply to: greywolf42: "Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames"
- Next in thread: greywolf42: "Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames"
- Reply: greywolf42: "Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2004 00:18:35 GMT
greywolf42 wrote:
> "Myxococcus xanthus" <mold-guardian@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:ce5e7813.0408030119.77bb3b25@posting.google.com...
>>Please do a google search for references to
>>Jones, David E.H., "The Stability of the Bicycle", Physics Today (April
>> 1970): 34-40
>>The gyroscopic contribution to bicycle stability is relatively minor.
>
> As a teenager -- purely as a scientific experiment ;) -- I repeatedly
> released an old bicycle to roll down a local hill. Except for the times it
> didn't make the turn, it stayed rolling for several hundred yards. That's
> hardly minor.
But, of course, the fact that an unoccupied bicycle can roll on its own
has nothing to do with gyroscopic action of its wheels. It can do that
because the geometry of its front fork provides feedback to make it
steer the wheels under its center of gravity. The couple formed by the
lean of the bike, the camber of the front wheel[#], and the weight of
the bike is MUCH larger than the gyroscopic force. And unlike the
latter, it is independent of speed, and works at low speeds (but not at
zero speed, so it does fall when friction brings it to a halt)
[#] extend the axis of the front fork to the ground, and note
it is in front of the wheel's point on the ground. That
distance is called the camber. The front fork is usually
bent forward to reduce the camber to the desired value for
the inclination of the fork. Compare a racing bike and a
touring bike....
If the effect were gyroscopic action then the bicycle would presumably
be stable going backwards also. Try it -- it isn't stable at all and
falls immediately -- the geometry of the front fork (at the rear) causes
oversteer.
Tom Roberts tjroberts@lucent.com
- Next message: vonroach: "Re: Is the universe spatially infinite?"
- Previous message: Eugene: "Re: Instantaneous spreading of relativistic wave packets does not contradict causality"
- In reply to: greywolf42: "Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames"
- Next in thread: greywolf42: "Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames"
- Reply: greywolf42: "Re: Gyroscopes - Usenet Physics FAQ - Reference frames"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|