Re: A Curve by Itself Cannot Trap Light

From: Eric Gisse (fseggNO!SPAM_at_uaf.edu)
Date: 08/07/04 

Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2004 13:31:06 -0800

On Sat, 07 Aug 2004 16:25:49 GMT, "Androcles"
<androc1es@nospamblueyonder.co.uk> wrote:

>
>"Eric Gisse" <fseggNO!SPAM@uaf.edu> wrote in message
>news:3688h09s9hfj77dtjp9b518akoe97rkku4@4ax.com...
>| On 6 Aug 2004 16:51:06 -0700, macromitch@internetCDS.com (Mitchell)
>| wrote:
>|
>| >What is it about curvature at an event horizon that could prevent
>| >light from following its way out? Is it a closed curve?
>| >No. I don't think so.
>| >It is an infinite Einstein shift at the horizon that predicts light
>| >won't come out; not any space curve.
>| >Space curvature by itself does not predict black holes.
>| >Only an end to time at the event horizon creates the vale
>| >on a black hole.
>| >
>| >Mitch Raemsch
>| > -- Light Falls --
>|
>| Oh my god, you are fucking stupid.
>
>It would seem after reading several of your posts that personal abuse is
>your mode of offering a reply, whilst appealing to your god.
>You really are quite an obnoxious religious fanatic, are you not?
>Androcles.

Naw.

Read back a little further. Watch Mitchell ignore the math of GR when
he insists on talking about GR.
>
>
>
>|
>| Again, time does NOT end at the event horizon. I defy you to quantify
>| that stupid, and incorrect, prediction.
>|
>| Coordinate time or proper time? Do you know the difference? Do you
>| know how the distinction becomes relevant?
>