Re: Why few arguments get resolved on this newsgroup.

From: Len Gaasenbeek (gaasbeek_at_rideau.net)
Date: 08/09/04 

Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 09:44:51 -0400

To Franco,

See below.

Len.
.......................................................
"Franco" <englishenglish@tin.it> wrote in message
news:2NzRc.90006$OR2.4821138@news3.tin.it...
>
> Len Gaasenbeek ha scritto nel messaggio
> <10hdcbj1l46eo0b@corp.supernews.com>...
> . This
> >explains why few things ever gets resolved on this newsgroup because when
> >logic is dismissed as old-fashioned, meaningful discussion becomes
> >impossible.
>
>
> Come on Len!!
> On this ng people are very disposal, helpful. They talk even about god, or
> what usually is a philosophical subject.
> So, how can you say such a thing?
>
> At any rate, I'm sure that if you need some help about Relativity or QM,
> here somebody is able to help you to undertand them.
>
> After all if we can use nuclear energy that is because QM works!!
> So, "maybe" there is some logic that you need to understand.
................................................
(Len) To "Franko", whoever you are. It just so happens that I am a retired
nuclear design engineer and was a member of the group which developed the
Candu fuel bundle for the first Canadian nuclear power station in Pickering.
I even got a patent to show for it.

I can assure you that the term QM was never mentioned in all the years I
worked in research and development as related to nuclear fission.

By the way, what are your credentials?
..................................................
> After all, even instant velocity dx/dt is difficult to understand if one
> does not admit that we are reasoning on functions and not about "real
> world".
>
> I think that everybody need to understand what is mathematics applied to
the
> physical world. That is because Galilei and Newton are so famous:))
>
> Even constant acceleration is difficult to understand if we do not use a
> correct mathematics, and I remind you that before Galileo, thinkers spent
> three centuries thinking about constant acceleration no to mention about
> instant velocity.
>
> I'm talking about this subject because I've just replied to David Smith
> about young people and how teachers should teach physics at school and at
> unversity.
>
> Bye bye
> Franco
>
>

Quantcast