Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error.
From: vonroach (hadrainc_at_earthlink.net)
Date: 08/11/04
- Next message: Mitchell: "Re: Emission and Absorbtion Slows light in a medium?"
- Previous message: Dale Trynor: "Re: Is the universe spatially infinite?"
- In reply to: John Kennaugh: "Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error."
- Next in thread: Henri Wilson: "Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error."
- Reply: Henri Wilson: "Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 00:40:09 GMT
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 21:24:07 +0100, John Kennaugh
<JKNG@kennaugh2435hex.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>"..... another postulate, which is only apparently irreconcilable with
>the former, namely, that light is always propagated in empty space with
>a definite velocity c which is independent of the state of motion of the
>emitting body".
An American physicist demonstrated this quite clearly if `empty space'
= a vacuum. You should take a little pride in that. It caught the
attention of Einstein. Until disproved `c' is a fundamental physical
constant. Any change as in a gravitational `field' is `apparent'.
- Next message: Mitchell: "Re: Emission and Absorbtion Slows light in a medium?"
- Previous message: Dale Trynor: "Re: Is the universe spatially infinite?"
- In reply to: John Kennaugh: "Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error."
- Next in thread: Henri Wilson: "Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error."
- Reply: Henri Wilson: "Re: How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
