Re: @@@@@ Re: The Massless Space-time Before Matter's Creation

From: Mitchell (macromitch_at_internetCDS.com)
Date: 08/12/04 

Date: 11 Aug 2004 17:06:33 -0700

"Kirk Gregory Czuhai" <lovekgc@altelco.net> wrote in message news:<41198c7c$1_2@Usenet.com>...
> Re: The Massless Space-time Before Matter's Creation
>
> Dear Folks,
>
> I, Kirk Gregory Czuhai, will give
> $google dollars to ANYONE
> who will PROVE
> that > Mitch Raemsch
> IS WRONG !!!!
>
> --
> *** New International SPAM email
> Blocking FREE web based SERVICE:
>
> http://www.altelco.net/~lovekgc/kgcLOVE.htm
>
> My Very Beautiful Poetry at
>
> http://www.altelco.net/~lovekgc/Awarm.doc
>
> http://www.altelco.net/~lovekgc/kgcpoetry.doc
>
> peace and love,
>
> (kirk) kirk gregory czuhai
>
> http://www.altelco.net/~churches/BlueRoses.htm
>
> do SEE AT LEAST!!! --->
>
> http://www.altelco.net/~lovekgc/algebrahelp.htm
>
> just to aid Alan Green Span, Practice Tree Conservation!
>
> FREE BEER -->
>
> http://www.altelco.net/~lovekgc/beer.htm
>
>
> "Mitchell" <macromitch@internetCDS.com> wrote in message
> news:9c3da975.0408061442.4943247c@posting.google.com...
> > Marcus Wellpoth <wellpoth@gmx.de> wrote in message
> news:<410df967$0$7303$9b4e6d93@newsread2.arcor-online.net>...
> > > Mitchell wrote:
> > >
> > > > The universe starts as a massless singularity which expands into
> > > > a bubble where matter is created spread apart.
> > > > The gravity of a "mass" singularity would prevent any mass expansion.
> > > > Space-time could expand from a point but it couldn't spread out a
> > > > matter singularity along with it.
> > > >
> > > > And about what it takes to create matter:
> > > > It is the increasing pressure of a moving massless space-time that
> > > > makes matter. Mass is born out of an original accelerating space-time.
> > > > The Unified Field is space-time and matter. The massless space-time
> > > > before matter is not yet the Unified Field.
> > > > When the super pressure of an accelerating space-time creates matter
> > > > the Unified Field is then formed.
> > > >
> > > > Mitch Raemsch
> > > > -- Light Falls --
> > > > -- And is Pushed --
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --------
> > > Newest fad is that there aren't any singularities. See Hawkings speech
> at
> > > GR17. Or what might fit your level of expertise more Scientific American
> of
> > > last month. And light doesn't fall it follows a null geodesic.
> > > mw
> > It falls Markus. Whether you like it or not.
> > It follows a curved geodesic.
> >
> > Hwking has said that the singularities of GR predict its failure.
> > But I don't see him standing up for the obvious if this is true.
> > There are no singularities because you can't have mass without
> > time. The end of space-time is the end of everything(else).
> >
> > The first physicists saw this clearly. When they solved the
> > equations for black holes they saw matter literally dropping
> > out of the universe.
> >
> > Hawking dropped the ball. He can't have it both ways.
> > He is self contrdictory because he works with a proclaimed failure of
> > physics and doesn't care. He is just covering his ***.
> >
> > It is obvious that if singularities are wrong then gravity's
> > strength must be finite and limited.
> > Mitch Raemsch
> > -- Light Falls Everywhere --

I guess I should have known I would bring the sociopaths out
of the fray.

Quantcast