Re: Aether is the empty space in which the Universe sits
From: Ole D. Rughede (ole.rughede_at_privat.dk)
Date: 08/14/04
- Next message: shuba: "Re: Tom Van Flandern and Newtonian Gravity"
- Previous message: Andr? Michaud: "Re: Any critic of modern Physics, it has to be better..."
- In reply to: FrediFizzx: "Re: Aether is the empty space in which the Universe sits"
- Next in thread: FrediFizzx: "Re: Aether is the empty space in which the Universe sits"
- Reply: FrediFizzx: "Re: Aether is the empty space in which the Universe sits"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 21:16:29 +0200
"FrediFizzx" <fredifizzx@hotmail.com> skrev i en meddelelse
news:2o73ssF7mn4hU1@uni-berlin.de...
> "Ole D. Rughede" <ole.rughede@privat.dk> wrote in message
> news:411ca1db$0$234$edfadb0f@dread11.news.tele.dk...
> |
> | "FrediFizzx" <fredifizzx@hotmail.com> skrev i en meddelelse
> | news:2o33osF6871fU1@uni-berlin.de...
> | > "Natksi" <dmk35@cam.ac.uk> wrote in message
> | > news:cfg0th$lta$1@sparta.btinternet.com...
> | >
> | > [snip]
> | >
> | > | A theory of an aether would not only have to agree with MMX
> | > | (not to hard) but with special relativity, general relativity
and
> | > | quantum field theory which is a lot more difficult. I'm not
aware
> | > | of any theory which can indeed do this as yet.
> | >
> | > This one does. Vacuum charge = +,- sqrt(hbar*c) and simply
> | > means that the quantum vacuum is a "network" of coupled quantum
> | > oscillators (bound throughout the Universe) in addition to
uncoupled
> | > oscillators (spectral energy density). Only fermions are
elementary.
> | > Bosons are always composites of fermions (real, virtual and
> | > "less than virtual").
> | >
> | > Photons are really just composites of "less than virtual" fermions
but
> | > when they are detected, the less than virtual fermions become
virtual
> | > at that instant affecting real matter.
> | >
> | Any references Fredi?
> | And may I have your opininon to Kaluza-Klein?
> | I gave some hints to mountainman and Paul Stowe
>
> References? Hehe. Well there are plenty of clues in the literature
> everywhere. See Volovik's "The Universe in a Helium Droplet" for some
> really good clues. It is still available online. This is my own idea
> developed from a combination of other ideas (including some from Paul
> Stowe--mainly, charge is mechanical) and in collaboration/tutoring
with a
> particle physicist theorist. See my response to Natski.
>
I have read your answer to Natksi.
It was with that in mind I asked for possible references.
Ole
- Next message: shuba: "Re: Tom Van Flandern and Newtonian Gravity"
- Previous message: Andr? Michaud: "Re: Any critic of modern Physics, it has to be better..."
- In reply to: FrediFizzx: "Re: Aether is the empty space in which the Universe sits"
- Next in thread: FrediFizzx: "Re: Aether is the empty space in which the Universe sits"
- Reply: FrediFizzx: "Re: Aether is the empty space in which the Universe sits"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
