Re: From 3D to 2D

From: Morituri-Max (newage_at_sendarico.net)
Date: 08/15/04 

Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2004 02:58:13 GMT

Mitchell wrote:
>> Nah, he's retarded.
>
> Not everything is relative. Einstein regreted calling his theory
> Relativity and afterword thought that Invariance theory would be better.
>
> The end of time is absolute.
> Time dilation is absolute.

See? Retarded.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: From 3D to 2D
    ... > Relativity and afterword thought that Invariance theory would be better. ... > The end of time is absolute. ... > Time dilation is absolute. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: From 3D to 2D
    ... >> Not in your own reference frame. ... Relativity and afterword thought that Invariance theory would be better. ... The end of time is absolute. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: From 3D to 2D
    ... >> Not in your own reference frame. ... Relativity and afterword thought that Invariance theory would be better. ... The end of time is absolute. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Natural Philosophy - Its challenge to SR
    ... ABSOLUTE, or UNIVERSAL, reference. ... If there are some laws of nature that are functions of absolute velocity, then we probably can measure our velocity by again measuring the laws of nature, and since we could obtain this velocity without having to use local, non-universal objects, it would again be an ABSOLUTE velocity. ... Again, Newton knew of no such laws, and although he created the idea of an absolute reference frame, Newtonian mechanics technically does NOT need a single, privileged reference frame with an undefined origin. ... It is built on top of the principle of Relativity ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Natural Philosophy - Its challenge to SR
    ... ABSOLUTE, or UNIVERSAL, reference. ... It is built on top of the principle of Relativity ... by subsequent changes in absolute velocity (unlike Newtonian ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
Quantcast