Re: plausable theory of gravity

From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\) (net_at_nospam.com)
Date: 08/15/04


Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 20:46:02 -0700

Dear Lloyd Burris:

"Lloyd Burris" <lloyd_burris@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:72abd3f5.0408141808.247ef25a@posting.google.com...
> "N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)" <N: dlzc1 D:cox T:net@nospam.com> wrote in
message news:<1cpTc.40923$xk.39488@fed1read01>...
> > Dar Lloyd Burris:
> >
> > "Lloyd Burris" <lloyd_burris@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:72abd3f5.0408132313.3d050d09@posting.google.com...
> > > thoovler@excite.com (Igor) wrote in message
> > news:<d434b6c6.0408101456.192177d3@posting.google.com>...
> > ...
> > > > The forces you are describing have already been accounted for.
> > > > They're known as Van der Waals forces and only really apply at very
> > > > small distances between individual atoms. They're responsible for
the
> > > > phenomenon of coherence (among other things), but are way too weak
to
> > > > have any effect at astronomical scales.
> > >
> > > Sure but these forces are the same ones that cause magnetism. If I
> > > understand it the earths magnetic field protects us from some very
bad
> > > stuff from the sun.
> >
> > Not really. It redirects most of those charged "bad" particles to the
> > poles. If anything, it directs *more* material to the Earth. The Van
> > Allen belts cast quite a "shadow". Photons and neutral particles are
> > unaffected by these fields.
> >
> > > If these forces are so weak then why is the earths
> > > magnetic field strong enough to protect our planet? If they are they
> > > strong enough to protect our planet why could they not be strong
> > > enough to form gravity?
> >
> > I'm not going to disagree with the sentiment, but magnetism is created
by
> > charges and relativity. Neutrons are not charged, have mass, and are
> > affected by gravity. Magnetism is insufficient as a description of
> > gravity. The causes of magnetism (of themselves) are insufficient as a
> > description of gravity. So far, only mass (more correctly,
mass/energy) is
> > suffcient for a description of gravity.
>
> I agree magnetism is insufficient as a description of gravity. My
> argument with magnetism is that anything magnetic in space would be
> pulled toward the earth by magnetism but other forces should I say
> fields i,ve been corrected several times account for gravity. I said
> magnetism was just one thing to be taking into account when
> calculating gravity even though it might be very small. I,ve been
> corrected on that too. I was told small forces/fields that act on a
> atomic scale does not account for gravity because they are too weak.
> Thats where I disagree.

It is good to keep an open mind. Gravity is the weakest of the forces, so
weak is what we should be looking for. But "magnetism" should have a
preference for a conductor over an insulator, and gravity has no such
preference. Keep in mind that magnetism is just electric charge and motion
"disguised".

David A. Smith



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Norway hit with Hiroshima scale metorite
    ... field is enough to divert the objects to earth. ... the gravity was the weak force that diverted the object. ... ends up being very small despite the fact that magnetism is ... rather than by electromagnetism, then if the nucleus were at ...
    (soc.retirement)
  • Re: Norway hit with Hiroshima scale metorite
    ... field is enough to divert the objects to earth. ... the gravity was the weak force that diverted the object. ... ends up being very small despite the fact that magnetism is ... rather than by electromagnetism, then if the nucleus were at ...
    (soc.retirement)
  • Re: Gravity and Magnetism
    ... >> It seems that magnetism is not the force that sustains orbiting. ... > electrons, perhaps it can attract 2.5 electrons but since there is no ... > force that exists therefore it should also be the force of gravity. ... Gravity obeys the law of mutual attraction ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Norway hit with Hiroshima scale metorite
    ... field is enough to divert the objects to earth. ... the gravity was the weak force that diverted the object. ... ends up being very small despite the fact that magnetism is ... rather than by electromagnetism, then if the nucleus were at ...
    (soc.retirement)
  • Re: Each increase in Amplitude Modulation steals a neighboring frequency
    ... A battery surrounded by a flat plate of copper, ... Gravity and sound both waves and both strength ... Gravity is exactly like electrons and magnetism. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)