Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws

From: Uncle Al (UncleAl0_at_hate.spam.net)
Date: 08/16/04 

Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2004 20:43:46 -0500

eleaticus wrote:
>
> "N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc)" <N: dlzc1 D:cox T:net@nospam.com> wrote in
> message news:hXRTc.65000$xk.24683@fed1read01...
> > "eleaticus" <eleaticus@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
> > news:P7QTc.7425$ii.5343@bignews5.bellsouth.net...
> >
> > Another reason to update my kill file...
> >
> > David A. Smith
>
> I take that (correctly?) as meaning you cannot show Maxwell non-invariant
> under the galilean translatory transformation without the spurious
> atheoretical time transform, t'=t, being asserted?
[snip crap]

Hey stooopid, Galilean transforms are empirically invalid in a
relativistic universe. You are playing solitaire with pinochle
deck - and losing every game. Idiot.

http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/effete0.jpg
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/effete1.png
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/effete2.png
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/effete3.png
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/effete4.png
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/effete5.jpg 

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
 (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf

Relevant Pages
Loading