Re: GOD=G_uv A MESSAGE TO "Max"
From: ZenIsWhen (ZenIsWhen_at_anywhere.com)
Date: 08/16/04
- Next message: Australopithecus Afarensis: "Re: What's up with gravity wave detection?"
- Previous message: Dale Trynor: "Re: The Emptiness of Theology"
- In reply to: George Hammond: "Re: GOD=G_uv A MESSAGE TO "Max""
- Next in thread: George Hammond: "Re: GOD=G_uv A MESSAGE TO "Max""
- Reply: George Hammond: "Re: GOD=G_uv A MESSAGE TO "Max""
- Reply: Scot McDermid: "Re: GOD=G_uv A MESSAGE TO "Max""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 01:39:47 -0400
"George Hammond" <research137@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:8lWTc.260838$a24.91922@attbi_s03...
>
> "Scot McDermid" <scotmc@optNOSPAMonline.net> wrote in message
> news:rdVTc.367$vc4.154343@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net...
> >
> > "George Hammond" <research137@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:1gUTc.131845$8_6.45397@attbi_s04...
> >
> > Alan asked:
> > > > But actual physical reality exists without this image. I fully
expect
> > > > actual physical reality to exist even after we're all dead. Don't
you?
> > >
> > > [Hammond]
> > > Contrary to your expectations, the ANSWER IS NO !!!
> > > The World would not exist if we were all dead!
> >
> > Aha! Well that actually ties a lot of your theory together.
> > What you are saying might actually be internally consistent.
> > Internally consistent but based on that false premise.
> >
> > Existence is not subjective. Existence is objective.
> > Now I'm sure I won't be able to prove that to you.
>
> [Hammond]
> Of course you can't prove it.... it's a false statement.
He said ... since you didn't comprehend it the first time .. that he would
not be able to prove it TO YOU.
He's starting to recognize the fact that the deranged, delusional and insane
world YOU seem to inhabit has nothing to do with the REAL world the rest of
us are in!
BTW .. The statement is not false!
> The word "objective" means "outside the mind".
> There is nothing that "exists" "outside the mind of Man".
> If there was, we wouldn't know about it, would we!
Yes .. we would.
We KNOW about dinosaurs from the EVIDENCE LEFT BEHIND .. yet we were not
here to see them.
We KNOW that a whole universe existed for billion of years ..... even though
we were NOT there to "see it".
WE KNOW that there are even PLANTS so old - and in such out of the way
places - that are HUNDREDS OF YEARS OLD ... and live before ANY man had
evere seen them!
even YOU - in your own insanity - ontradict your own claims!
If mankind (using YOUR claims) existed for 40,000 years .... then how could
teh UNIVERSE (you also admit) be 15 billion years old .. if NOTHING EXISTS
OUTSIDE OF MAN'S OBSERVATION/MIND?
What IS, then, the UNIVERSE that existed between that time of 15 billion,
and 40,000 years ago?
IF it was "nothing", then it was not "a universe".......... IF there was a
"universe" then SOMETHING EXISTED OUTSIDE OF MANKIND'S MIND!!!
You don't even understand that when your working with nothing but corrupt
ideas and insane claims - eventually you will prove yourself a liar with
your own words!!!
(snip remaining regurgitated, unsupported ignorance, bellowing and crap)!
- Next message: Australopithecus Afarensis: "Re: What's up with gravity wave detection?"
- Previous message: Dale Trynor: "Re: The Emptiness of Theology"
- In reply to: George Hammond: "Re: GOD=G_uv A MESSAGE TO "Max""
- Next in thread: George Hammond: "Re: GOD=G_uv A MESSAGE TO "Max""
- Reply: George Hammond: "Re: GOD=G_uv A MESSAGE TO "Max""
- Reply: Scot McDermid: "Re: GOD=G_uv A MESSAGE TO "Max""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
