Re: Aether is the empty space in which the Universe sits

From: Dale Trynor (dalet_at_nbnet.nb.ca)
Date: 08/19/04 

Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 06:07:43 GMT

Ole D. Rughede wrote:
> "Paul Stowe" <ps@acompletelyjunkaddress.net> skrev i en meddelelse
> news:lic5i09fr56nr0m6d4fjimon60l9gui30c@4ax.com...
>
>>On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 15:27:31 +0200, "Ole D. Rughede"
>
> <ole.rughede@privat.dk>
>
>>wrote:
>>
>>

[snip]

> Fredi has a point here: Without the aether mass would be
> weight- and massless? - We may say mass couldn't exist
> but would immediately become free aether energy U.
>
> Weight and gravity are completely relative quantites, but
> that our spaceships and their crews may survive in space
> and exist like astrophysical bodies is due to the aether,
> why space is a STE-continuum. Not an empty vacuum!
>
> Mass cannot exist without the aether, and aether cannot
> exist without radiating masses.

Dale Trynor wrote:
If you mean Quantum vacuum, I agree.
The alternative theory I posted on predicts that its only the scale and
time relation to space that changes and matter wont disappear. Then
again you cant have a completely empty vacuum, or single atoms would end
up as larger than the universe with equally nearly infinitely fast time,
or worse. In that theory you cannot have space without gravity and a
gedanken I use to illustrate this is an analogue of Zeno s paradox only
when instead of 1/2 the distance each time we also contract all of ones
references on length by 1/2 each time as well. Note that he cannot
measure his remaining distance without the same problem applied to
anything he can send ahead to measure the remaining distance.
If as in the theory,gravitational time dilation just by itself can be
shown to contract matter and anything one can measure distances with
then what happens when one approaches a black hole. When the time
dilation is now 1000 times less than it originally was all of his
references on length must have also have contracted by 1000 times giving
our observer traveler the prospective of a much larger black hole where
everything that went into its creation must also now measure 1000 times
farther away.

When this goes to infinity he ends up measuring a black hole thats light
years across from his prospective and cannot contain enough mass to
still be a black hole from his prospective. All the mass that went into
its creation must have gone thought the same process and to him now
measure as to too diffuse. Black holes depend on large amounts of mass
in one place at one time not all over the place at different times.

This leads to the same predictions as those given for big bang or
inflationary theorys if you could be an internal observer when a black
hole forms.

It gets tricky here because of the way one must still have enough mass
to preserve its appearance as a black hole for our external observers
and leads to similar questions about how our universe would be behave if
it didn't have as much mass etc.

- There is a balance here,
> indicating a self-supporting universe of mass and radiation,
> meaning a universal conservation of mass, energy, and
> momentum in a hair-fine balance. -

Thats the question that I left a bit short above.

  And from this we infer
> that all fairy-tales about big-bang and universal expansion
> are sheer nonsense

Why should that be nonsense.
I have discussed how this alternative theory ends up giving similar
predictions as those given for inflation theory.

Note how this alternative theory also looks at questions of how the
quantum vacuum must also be related. Increasing the quantum vacuum
contracts everything one can measure it with, preserving that Lorentz
invariances from our close up observers point of view.
The theory hypothesizes that Casimir plates should not measure any
detectable changes even while they must have become contracted and that
this must happen in such a way that also expands the space in and around
them. The idea is that the quantum vacuum or the empty space itself must
have also changed accordingly. I have posted questions looking at what
would happen if this relationship were not preserved.

Later parts of the theory argue that its not just a shorter measure of
the same space but that its literally more space because it hypothesizes
  alternative mechanisms to conserve the amounts of gravity one should
get from such things as black holes. It looks at alternatives to
gravitational binding energy to do this balancing.

What this also predicts is that if you could reduce the quantum vacuum,
objects would increase in volume and display a faster relative time. A
tunnel of such depleted space ends up giving remarkably similar
predictions to those given for wormholes.

  of the same quality as the reason given
> by one of Hawking's listeners: why the Earth is not falling
> out through the buttom of the universe, namely because it
> rests on turtles all way down!
>
> Well, acording to Genesis God did not create turtles first.
>
> Ole D. Rughede
>

I do promise it will be worth your time to seriously look at this
alternative theory as it dose more than just gets rid of the turtles.
Bonus that its new enough to give you lots of chance to be first with
your own conclusions.
Dale

Loading