Re: sci.math vs True Believers
From: eric gisse (fsegg_at_NOSPAMATuaf.edu)
Date: 08/19/04
- Next message: suzysewnshow: "Re: No Atom is truly of Neutral Charge = perhaps Gravity"
- Previous message: Tom Van Flandern: "Re: Tom Van Flandern and Newtonian Gravity"
- In reply to: eleaticus: "sci.math vs True Believers"
- Next in thread: eleaticus: "Re: sci.math vs True Believers"
- Reply: eleaticus: "Re: sci.math vs True Believers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 23:15:56 -0800
On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 22:12:40 -0500, "eleaticus"
<eleaticus@bellsouth.net> wrote:
[snip]
>Uncle Al and Gisse attacked my completely non-physics post by assailing my
>physics.
[snip]
Terribly sorry, I promise it will happen again.
- Next message: suzysewnshow: "Re: No Atom is truly of Neutral Charge = perhaps Gravity"
- Previous message: Tom Van Flandern: "Re: Tom Van Flandern and Newtonian Gravity"
- In reply to: eleaticus: "sci.math vs True Believers"
- Next in thread: eleaticus: "Re: sci.math vs True Believers"
- Reply: eleaticus: "Re: sci.math vs True Believers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
