Re: Stupid Einstein question.
From: suzysewnshow (suzysewnshow_at_yahoo.com.au)
Date: 08/20/04
- Next message: Henri Wilson: "Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Evidence?"
- Previous message: George Hammond: "Re: GOD=G_uv Y GENESIS IS TRUE"
- In reply to: Androcles: "Re: Stupid Einstein question."
- Next in thread: Marcus Wellpoth: "Re: Stupid Einstein question."
- Reply: Marcus Wellpoth: "Re: Stupid Einstein question."
- Reply: Androcles: "Re: Stupid Einstein question."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 20 Aug 2004 15:03:34 -0700
> Actually, this thought experiment is correct. The light's speed inside the
> train
> (taking out any obstruction along the length) will be c as seen by the train
> observer, and outside the train will be c as seen by the trackside observer,
> and the same will be true for the thunder moving at Mach 1. Air is a medium
> for light just as it is for sound. Each observer sees the other's light
> move at c-v, c+v because for them, it does. So, since you would not
> seriously expect both to hear the thunder simultaneously, you cannot expect
> them to see the flash simultaneously whilst being at the same place.
>
> Androcles.
Surely you recall the experiment with a electric door-bell inside a
bell-jar. When the air is pumped out of the jar, the sound is
interrupted but the door-bell is plainly visible. This would seem to
cast some doubt on your statement: << Air is a medium for light just
as it is for sound. >>
Kind regards,
Sue...
- Next message: Henri Wilson: "Re: SR's velocity addition -- ANY Experimental Evidence?"
- Previous message: George Hammond: "Re: GOD=G_uv Y GENESIS IS TRUE"
- In reply to: Androcles: "Re: Stupid Einstein question."
- Next in thread: Marcus Wellpoth: "Re: Stupid Einstein question."
- Reply: Marcus Wellpoth: "Re: Stupid Einstein question."
- Reply: Androcles: "Re: Stupid Einstein question."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|