Re: Stupid Einstein question.
From: Androcles (androc1es_at_nospamblueyonder.co.uk)
Date: 08/20/04
- Next message: Uncle Al: "Re: sci.math vs True Believers"
- Previous message: ZenIsWhen: "Re: GOD = G_uv to 2 decimal places"
- In reply to: suzysewnshow: "Re: Stupid Einstein question."
- Next in thread: suzysewnshow: "Re: Stupid Einstein question."
- Reply: suzysewnshow: "Re: Stupid Einstein question."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 23:26:22 GMT
"suzysewnshow" <suzysewnshow@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
news:e0a23188.0408201403.7582371b@posting.google.com...
| > Actually, this thought experiment is correct. The light's speed inside
the
| > train
| > (taking out any obstruction along the length) will be c as seen by the
train
| > observer, and outside the train will be c as seen by the trackside
observer,
| > and the same will be true for the thunder moving at Mach 1. Air is a
medium
| > for light just as it is for sound. Each observer sees the other's light
| > move at c-v, c+v because for them, it does. So, since you would not
| > seriously expect both to hear the thunder simultaneously, you cannot
expect
| > them to see the flash simultaneously whilst being at the same place.
| >
| > Androcles.
|
| Surely you recall the experiment with a electric door-bell inside a
| bell-jar. When the air is pumped out of the jar, the sound is
| interrupted but the door-bell is plainly visible. This would seem to
| cast some doubt on your statement: << Air is a medium for light just
| as it is for sound. >>
Strange as it may seem, I can hear in the dark. I cannot see the bell jar in
the dark, though.
Maybe light passes though both air AND vacuum AND bell jars, but sound
doesn't pass through vacuum and is attentuated by bell jars. Could that be
why?
Now tell me, how does that cast doubt on the statement "Air is a medium for
light just as it is for sound." ?
Y'know, I've known quite a few relativists that are totally irrational when
the religion is countered by simple observation and logic. Are you one of
them?
Androcles.
|
| Kind regards,
| Sue...
- Next message: Uncle Al: "Re: sci.math vs True Believers"
- Previous message: ZenIsWhen: "Re: GOD = G_uv to 2 decimal places"
- In reply to: suzysewnshow: "Re: Stupid Einstein question."
- Next in thread: suzysewnshow: "Re: Stupid Einstein question."
- Reply: suzysewnshow: "Re: Stupid Einstein question."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|