Re: sci.math vs True Believers
From: Uncle Al (UncleAl0_at_hate.spam.net)
Date: 08/20/04
- Next message: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: The Principle of Least Action and God."
- Previous message: Androcles: "Re: Stupid Einstein question."
- In reply to: eleaticus: "Re: sci.math vs True Believers"
- Next in thread: eleaticus: "Re: sci.math vs True Believers"
- Reply: eleaticus: "Re: sci.math vs True Believers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 18:40:20 -0500
eleaticus wrote:
>
> "Uncle Al" <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
> news:41266059.A21D54EF@hate.spam.net...
>
> > 1) Don't top post, idiot.
> > 2) Everything you have trolled is trashed by three short
> > sentences, idiot.
> > 3) Address the scientific issue, idiot. Demonstrate that
> > Galilean transforms take precedence over Lorentz Transforms. You
> > cannot. it isn't true. It is empirically untrue. You are an
> > ineducable idiot.
>
> I have wanted to address the physics issues from the word go, but jerkoffs
> such as Carr - with jackass support from you - have spent many hundreds of
> posts saying the basic, correct algebra is wrong, leaving it impossible to
> proceed to the match or not with experiment because y'all won't acknowledge
> the simple validity of the standard by which to judge the galilean theory:
[snip]
Ineducable psychotic idiot.
<http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/RelWWW/tests.html>
Mathematics of gravitation
<http://rattler.cameron.edu/EMIS/journals/LRG/Articles/Volume4/2001-4will/index.html>
http://arXiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0311039
<http://www.weburbia.demon.co.uk/physics/experiments.html>
Experimental constraints on General Relativity
<http://tycho.usno.navy.mil/ptti/ptti2002/paper20.pdf>
Nature 425 374 (2003)
<http://rattler.cameron.edu/EMIS/journals/LRG/Articles/Volume6/2003-1ashby/index.html>
http://www.eftaylor.com/pub/projecta.pdf
<http://www.public.asu.edu/~rjjacob/Lecture16.pdf>
Relativity in the GPS system
<http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/relativ/airtim.html>
Hafele-Keating Experiment
Science 303(5661) 1143;1153 (2004)
http://arXiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0401086
http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0312071
Deeply relativistic neutron star binaries
<http://www.npl.washington.edu/eotwash/pdf/prl83-3585.pdf>
http://arXiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0301024
Nordtvedt Effect
Hey stooopid eleaticus, science is empirical.
Hey stooopid eleaticus, spacetime is a Lorentz transformation.
Hey stooopid eleaticus, spacetime is a 4-D hyperbolic rotation.
Ineducable psychotic idiot.
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0306076.pdf
<http://www.metaresearch.org/solar%20system/gps/absolute-gps-1meter-3.ASP>
http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/pubs/gps/gpsuser/gpsuser.pdf
http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/pubs/gps/sigspec/default.htm
http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/pubs/gps/icd200/default.htm
http://www.trimble.com/gps/index.html
http://sirius.chinalake.navy.mil/satpred/
http://www.phys.lsu.edu/mog/mog9/node9.html
http://egtphysics.net/GPS/RelGPS.htm
http://www.schriever.af.mil/gps/Current/current.oa1
http://edu-observatory.org/gps/gps_books.html
<http://www-astronomy.mps.ohio-state.edu/~pogge/Ast162/Unit5/gps.html>
-- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
- Next message: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\): "Re: The Principle of Least Action and God."
- Previous message: Androcles: "Re: Stupid Einstein question."
- In reply to: eleaticus: "Re: sci.math vs True Believers"
- Next in thread: eleaticus: "Re: sci.math vs True Believers"
- Reply: eleaticus: "Re: sci.math vs True Believers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|