Re: GOD=G_uv A MESSAGE TO "Max"
From: ZenIsWhen (ZenIsWhen_at_anywhere.com)
Date: 08/23/04
- Next message: Enoch: "Re: Hammond sees the obvious?"
- Previous message: Eric Gisse: "Re: The corruption of the Relativity cultist was: sci.math vs True Believers"
- In reply to: George Hammond: "Re: GOD=G_uv A MESSAGE TO "Max""
- Next in thread: ZenIsWhen: "Re: GOD=G_uv A MESSAGE TO "Max""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2004 22:05:25 -0400
"George Hammond" <research137@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:xa7Wc.53553$mD.13885@attbi_s02...
>
> "Richard Smol" <jazzcat@dds.nl> wrote in message
> news:2767b33a.0408221041.4bb2bd2f@posting.google.com...
> > "George Hammond" <research137@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:<nd%Vc.294380$a24.131237@attbi_s03>...
> > > "Richard Smol" <jazzcat_nospam_@dds.nl> wrote in message
> > > news:COPVc.859$tg.158@amsnews02.chello.com...
> > >
> > > Physics has a strict definiton of what it calls "observables".
> > > Postition, Velocity, Mass, Energy, Momentum etc. are called
> > > OBSERVABLES. "Observables" are said to EXIST. That
> > > doesn't mean that we have to actually go out and observe the
> > > position and velocity of every object in the universe to make
> > > it exist.
> > > If IN PRINCIPLE IT IS AN OBSERVABLE, THEN IT
> > > EXISTS.
> >
> > Yes, but from that it doesn't follow that if something isn't
> > observable, it doesn't exist. This is basic logic reasoning.
>
> [Hammond]
> Science says: "ONLY observables exist".
> therefore it follows that if something is not an
> observable, it does not exist.
Science says NO SUCH insane thing!!!!
>
> > RS
>
> [Hammond]
> Then of course there are actually idiots that reason as follows:
> If I say:... "I see sand on the beach and
> picked up a graiin of sand and say 'sand exists' ".
>
> Then there is always some moron who says "yeah but you
> have to pick up every grain of sand on the beach and observe
> it or it won't exist".
That sounds EXACTLY like YOUR insane "logic".
>
> Hey.... I'm not a therapist for the mentally retarded, sorry.
Of course!
You would be a patient - were you to EVER get enough intelligence to even
come CLOSE to the truth!
- Next message: Enoch: "Re: Hammond sees the obvious?"
- Previous message: Eric Gisse: "Re: The corruption of the Relativity cultist was: sci.math vs True Believers"
- In reply to: George Hammond: "Re: GOD=G_uv A MESSAGE TO "Max""
- Next in thread: ZenIsWhen: "Re: GOD=G_uv A MESSAGE TO "Max""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
