Re: Hammond correct?
From: George Hammond (research137_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 08/23/04
- Next message: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: I'd like to understand this better."
- Previous message: George Hammond: "Re: Hammond sees the obvious?"
- In reply to: Joseph Michael Bay: "Re: Hammond correct?"
- Next in thread: M Otis Beard: "Re: Hammond correct?"
- Reply: M Otis Beard: "Re: Hammond correct?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 09:19:55 GMT
"Joseph Michael Bay" <jmbay@Stanford.EDU> wrote in message
news:cgbviv$7p6$1@news.Stanford.EDU...
> Theresa Willis <tdwillis@earthlink.net> writes:
>
> >On Sun, 22 Aug 2004 10:57:06 -0400, Glenn Knickerbocker
> ><NotR@bestweb.net> wrote:
>
> >>On Sun, 22 Aug 2004 10:54:08 GMT, "George Hammond"
> >><research137@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>human beings, the observers". Have you ever seen a Neanderthal
> >>>reading a Physics book, or a horse, or a clam?
> >>
> >>I can honestly say I have never seen a Neanderthal reading a horse or a
> >>clam.
> >>
>
> >Eh, I've seen them reading horse and clam tracks.
>
> >They were proficient hunters, you know.
>
>
> CLAMS GOT LEGS!
[Hammond]
Dunno about the Clams, but round here they
sure attract a lot of "hairleggers" trying to
dig them up with a rake.
> --
> Joseph Michael Bay
> Cancer Biology
> Stanford University
====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
1st mirror site:
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
2nd mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
new site (under construction):
http://home.comcast.net/~proof-of-god
====================================
- Next message: Ken S. Tucker: "Re: I'd like to understand this better."
- Previous message: George Hammond: "Re: Hammond sees the obvious?"
- In reply to: Joseph Michael Bay: "Re: Hammond correct?"
- Next in thread: M Otis Beard: "Re: Hammond correct?"
- Reply: M Otis Beard: "Re: Hammond correct?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
