Re: Hammond correct?

From: David DeLaney (dbd_at_gatekeeper.vic.com)
Date: 08/25/04 

Date: 25 Aug 2004 00:23:03 -0400

George Hammond <research137@hotmail.com> wrote:
>"Scot McDermid" <scotmc@optNOSPAMonline.net> wrote in message
>> "George Hammond" <research137@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> > [Hammond]
>> > Accepted... now lets get on with the job of getting
>> > some food in the mouths of a billion starving children.
>>
>> You have implied that Hammond Theory will help with that. How exactly?
>
>[Hammond]
>Don't go cutsie on me.

You heard him. NO CUTSIES! Wait your turn in line for your SPOG ration with
all the other kids.

> A scientific proof of God, immediately de facto ecumenically
>unifies the worlds religions.

One of these adjectives is not like the others / one of these adjectives
just doesn't belong...

> You must be an idiot for even asking the question.

Dave "hey, idiots got to ask questions too, otherwise how will they IMPROVE
 their MORAL LOT?" DeLaney 

-- 
\/David	DeLaney	posting	from dbd@vic.com "It's not the pot that	grows the flower
It's not the clock that	slows the hour 	The definition's plain for anyone to see
Love is	all it takes to	make a family" - R&P. VISUALIZE	HAPPYNET VRbeable<BLINK>
http://www.vic.com/~dbd/ - net.legends FAQ & Magic / I WUV you in all CAPS! --K.