Re: I'd like to understand this better.

From: suzysewnshow (suzysewnshow_at_yahoo.com.au)
Date: 08/25/04 

Date: 24 Aug 2004 21:00:22 -0700

dynamics@vianet.on.ca (Ken S. Tucker) wrote in message news:<2202379a.0408230126.16e6909f@posting.google.com>...
> D.McAnally@i'm_a_gnu.uq.net.au (David McAnally) wrote in message news:<cfut3q$676$1@bunyip.cc.uq.edu.au>...
> ...
> > >> snip a pile of McAnally BS...
> > >> To quote McAnally from this thread on 07-07,
> > >> =========================================================================
> > >> I was imprecise.
> >
> > I admitted, as soon as I became aware of the problem, that I had been
> > imprecise, and immediately rectified the situation with a clarification to
> > explain it. Bill Hobba, for whom I was clarifying what I wrote, responded
> > to my posting in a manner that demonstrated that he understood the
> > clarification perfectly, which showed that my clarification achieved its
> > purpose. I should not be castigated for having done what any *honourable*
> > person would have done.
>
> That's typical McAnally BS,
> Dump a pile a poop on someone and apologize
> for missing the toilet, "I'm imprecise", ***
> "honourable"...
>
> > Ken S. Tucker's claim that what I wrote is BS makes no sense whatsoever.
> > He has to justify himself.
> > Ken S. Tucker wrote his scathing remarks about me because he was under
> > the impression (knowing that I had killfiled him)
>
> More McAnally BS, I'm supposed to "justify"
> myself to a "killfile".
>
> >that I would never know how he had denigrated me
> >(he obviously did not have the intelligence to think of the prospect
> > that somebody else might quote him verbatim,
>
> Sue snitched and is probably killfiled now too.
>
> >as had
> > been done with the posting to which I am replying). Perhaps he should
> > check into the laws of defamation sometime, because, with regard to my
> > education, I have a Ph.D in Mathematical Physics, and I have had technical
> > papers published in various prestigious International Physics journals.
>
> There McAnally claimed his BS smells good,
> so getting dumped on is good, because his
> lawyer says so. Getting a Ph.d from Corn
> Flake U, is a great cost saver.
>
> > >If motion affects your clock you should take it back where you got it.
> > :-)
> > >In any case, remember that clocks don't measure the passage of time...
> > >they simulate it.
> > >Kind regards,
> > >Sue...
>
> Sue, McAnally often sends messages to me
> via a third person, we're all fascinated.
>
> > David
>
> Regards
> Ken S. Tucker

Yes Ken, McA and I have met elsewhere. Sorry I spilled the beans. Does
that mean the game is over? ;-)
;;-) Sue...

Quantcast