Re: GOD=G_uv A MESSAGE TO "Max"

From: ZenIsWhen (ZenIsWhen_at_anywhere.com)
Date: 08/25/04 

Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 11:41:59 -0400

"Scot McDermid" <scotmc@optNOSPAMonline.net> wrote in message
news:1%ZWc.1252$ZD4.1188818@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net...
>
> "Goran Dhemmeog" <hcraeser731@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:b9eccd47.0408242356.1909665d@posting.google.com...
> > "George Hammond" <research137@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:<JzQWc.303926$a24.58613@attbi_s03>...
> > > > You misunderstood the question, George. I asked
> > > > if *YOU* (George Hammond) become violent when
> > > > confronted in person about Hammond Theory.
> > >
> > > [Hammond]
> > > Are you shittin me? Like any other world class
> > > scholar I call the police. Here; I'll introduce you to
> > > my local police department:
> > > http://www.barnstablepolice.com/
> >
> > I would think that a world class scholar would be always ready to
> > discuss the matters in his interest, with politeness and respect, and
> > would also admit an error when he makes one. So far none of the
> > professors and scientist that I have talked to have called the police,
> > but then again I suppose the "Real Great Scientists" may have
> > different views. What would the charges be? The prosecutor: "The
> > defendant engaged George Hammond in a discussion about the Scientific
> > Proof of God, and did not agree with George. Due to the outrageous
> > nature of the crime, the people request to deny bail."
>
> When I wrote the question that was what I meant by "confronted
> in person about Hammond Theory": "to engage in discussion and
> not agree".

That's enough to make George fly off the handle.
The question becomes how far ... and how violent.

Due to the psychotic nature of some of his claims and arguments - it's best
to keep a safe distance.

Quantcast