Re: The physical paradox of the twins.

From: Peter Kinane (pkinane_at_iol.ie)
Date: 08/25/04 

Date: 25 Aug 2004 14:50:46 -0700

pkinane@iol.ie (Peter Kinane) wrote in message news:<d8097fcc.0408250447.2e700dab@posting.google.com>...

> Note: I have changed the directions of the Sun and the Earth:
> "Alternatively, let's log the event based on half yearly intervals, or
> 0.5 yrs. SES's:
> P_0(x_0, y_0, z_0, t_0),
> P_1(x_0.001, y0.011, z_0/?, t_0.5).
> P_2(x_0.002, y_0.002, z_0/?, t_1.0).
> P_3(x_0.003, y_0.033, z_0/?, t_1.5).
> P_4(x_0.004, y_0.004, z_0/?, t_2.0).,
> and so on. A pattern emerges, as would one for various stars, etc. "
>
> pk

I have added a little rigour to TECCS:
http://www.effectuationism.com/forum/messages/27/27.html?1071620499

"[] Moving Object/Animal in relationship with FOR is an event, with
readily determined x,y,z co-ordinates and the standard rate of event
(RE) (or standard event speed (SES)) the t-co-ordinate.

Such co-ordinate systems of events could be developed into calendars
as follows:

The concept of a "point": the co-ordinate system (or observer) is a
co-ordinate system of, or consists of a block of, three-dimensional
points - the dimensions of points being various- -different values of
x,y,z of the system, but also with a standard rate of event - in
effect a t-standard. []".

Peter Kinane
http://www.effectuationism.com/

Quantcast