Re: God=G_uv PURE PHYSICS

From: George Hammond (research137_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 08/26/04 

Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 09:06:59 GMT

"Rick Cvejic" <hybridgex@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:6ef5b8f1.0408252124.13447619@posting.google.com...

> > > > > Note that the word "God" used throughout this paper refers
> > > > > to the percentage of the brain which is ungrown.
> > > > > And so, it seems reasonable that GOD is actually the BGD
> > > > > and is expressed as a percentage. Therefore
> > > > >
> > > > > GOD = BGD (%) = G_uv
> > > > >
> > > > > I will admit that I really do not know what the gravitational
> > > > > tensor G_uv is, but I'm reasonably sure that it is not a
percentage.
> > > > > But if BGD is related to G_uv in some way then there must be a
> > > > > mathematical function to convert between the two. Therefore
> > > > > BGD (%) = f (G_uv) where f is a function.
> > > >
> > > > [Hammond]
> <snip>
> > > > In "Psychometry space" we find that it is the BGD (brain gowth
deficit)
> > > > which causing the curvature. The "function" you are looking for
> > > > is actually:
> > > >
> > > > Eqn. 2
> > > > BGD
> > > > G_uv = ------------------- (see "note 3" at the end of my
paper)
> > > > 1 - BGD
> > > >
> > > > (note for small BGD this is approximately: G_uv = BGD
> > > > which is the familiar equation I normally post.
> > > > Most of (adult) Psychometry is covered by this simpler
> > > > equation, because the BGD is only really large in children;
> > > > then we would have to use the more accurate version, Eqn. 2
>
>
> Interesting formula you have there Georgie. Let me have a think about
> that one.
>
> God = G_uv = BGD / (1 - BGD)
>
> You assert that BGD changes (decreases) as we grow to adulthood, and
> that it has been trending downward for generations. Profound. So God
> was more real in the Middle Ages than now, and is more real when
> you're young, and less real as you age. Wow! I suppose that explains
> the 'ole 'childhood wonderment', not to mention the superstitous
> nature of historical peoples.

[Hammond]
Astute observation. Every statement you have made is exactly
true. I would guess, judging from Secular Trend data, that the
"size of Heaven", or "God in Heaven", was probably twice as
large during the Dark Ages as it is now. This doublessly explains
such phenomena as the Notre Dame or Reims cathedrals, and
the Crusades .. not to mention the Inquisition etc. How large
Heaven was during the Apostolic Age we can only guess... but
judging from the New Testament, it must have been even larger
still. Probably an all time high water mark for high levels of
(cf. Roman) civilization.
   The most dramatic increase in the Secular Trend (shrinking
of Heaven) has been since the Industrial Revolution... but the problem
in the Third World still remains at critical levels... even in Moslem
countries.

> "Ye Gods! What was that!"
> "Lightning."
> "What caused that?"
> "Hmmmm... maybe God is pissed at us!"
> "Well, it couldnt have anything to do with charged air particles...
> thats just silly."
> "Yeah. Lets go kill a mammoth"
> "w00t!"
>
> So God is not a universal constant, or even a personal constant. He
> (it) varies from person to person, and disappears over time.
> Interesting....

[Hammond]
Yes... again.... precisely correct.... and this fact is what you need
to know, first and foremost.... to comprehend all of human history,
and the structure and phenomena of the contemporary world.
People who don't know it are literally in the dark... I hope you
can appreciate what kind of a problem this can cause in the world.

> Okay, so, the bigger your BGD, the more necessary, or the more "real"
> God is to you. So, congrats all you atheists and agnostics! Hammond
> has proven that you are leagues ahead of the God-fearing plebians!
> Interesting that one of the most religious countries in the world is
> the USA. What does that tell us?

[Hammond]
It tells us that "we" are the ones who have to worry about
the large BGD in the rest of the world, and the fact that
those billions of blinded people can stampede like terrified
cattle at any moment.

> Of course, it also explains suicide
> bombers - noone intelligent could possibly blow themselves up, but
> someone with a massive BGD would barely notice they were dead!

[Hammond]
Yes... all of the sucicide bombers and hijackers show unmistakable
signs of severe develoopmntal problems, possible retardation even.
Given that the rational scientific explanation of "God" is unknown
in these cultures... they can become persuaded of very bizzare
pictures of reality. and not knowing what it is... errant religious
beliefs can be used to scare them into dong almost anything.

> Tell me, Hammond... is it possible for BGD to INcrease?

[Hammond]
Of course nothing can "ungrow" once it iis grown... however,
there IS a well known effect that actually mimics an increase
in the BGD and this is known as "depression"... or even "repression",
and can be large and dramatic. It is known to be principally
caused by "social abuse" (child abuse, cultural abuse, stress,
competion, psychological warfare, etc.). This is one of the
major problems that caused the formation of organized
Religion in the first place. Fact is, all of us to some extent
have a significant degree of "repression".... caused by
"mental blocks" (so called).... and Religion is constantly
seeking ways to undo these blocks and set people free.
It's not an esy task... because the underlying (social) causes
are real.

> Because it
> seems that you were once a highly intelligent being. What does it take
> to turn a lightbulb into a fruitloop?

[Hammond]
Reverse psychology.... backwards cultures.... social abuse.

> Of course, thats all assuming Hammond is right. I am still looking
> forward a coherent explaination of how a deficiency in human brain
> growth could create life, or spawn a universe. You know... considering
> human brains didnt exist when that happened.

[Hammond]
that is all explained by the fact that the "human brain" as we know it,
"suddenly appeared" 40,000 years ago.... and this is the explanation
of the so called "Biblical Creation" which actually occured at that
time because of that.

[Hammond]
Finally... I must say I am a bit nervous that a person like you...
without a security clearance..... should suddenly be one of only
a handful of men on the planet should be walking around with
this kind of information.... but, I suppopse, since you were the
one who obtained it by your own efforts while all the others,
save a few have simple ignored it. This tells me that you
apparently are somehow qualified to have it. Congratulations.
====================================
   SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
        1st mirror site:
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
        2nd mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
     new site (under construction):
http://home.comcast.net/~proof-of-god
====================================

Relevant Pages

  • Re: An Open Letter to [Hammond]
    ... > That's because there are many reasons why religion is not a good way ... > he spoke of the mind of God then he was using a metaphor, ... > Many other great scientists have been religous. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: ANCIENT EGYPT- GOD=G_uv
    ... >> of religion was born. ... it is certainly a fact that Akhenaten discovered monotheism ... The Egyptians saw the "Sun god" as the central god ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: God=G_uv PURE PHYSICS
    ... > You assert that BGD changes as we grow to adulthood, ... So God ... Religion in the first place. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: GOD=G_uv INVISIBLE WORLD
    ... >> in physicis, including the editor. ... president of the Science and Religion forum. ... your paper does not prove God. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: GOD=G_uv INVISIBLE WORLD
    ... >> in physicis, including the editor. ... president of the Science and Religion forum. ... your paper does not prove God. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)