Re: Yes Science Needs God
From: Gregory L. Hansen (glhansen_at_steel.ucs.indiana.edu)
Date: 08/26/04
- Next message: mitch perkins: "Re: Yes Science Needs God"
- Previous message: Eric Gisse: "Re: When Mass Doesn't Resist"
- In reply to: Mitchell: "Re: Yes Science Needs God"
- Next in thread: Bill Hobba: "Re: Yes Science Needs God"
- Reply: Bill Hobba: "Re: Yes Science Needs God"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 20:41:33 +0000 (UTC)
In article <9c3da975.0408261111.4322cc4b@posting.google.com>,
Mitchell <macromitch@internetCDS.com> wrote:
>"robert j. kolker" <nowhere@nowhere.net> wrote in message
>news:<2p5pudFgddgiU3@uni-berlin.de>...
>> Mitchell wrote:
>> > Science says a mindless lump created this universe. But who created
>> > that so called "singularity?" Science won't admit God even when faced
>> > with Him.
>> > Mitch Raemsch
>>
>> And which God created God. Did He create himself? The concept is
>> empirically unsuportable, there for it must be expelled from science.
>>
>> Bob Kolker
>
>The universe needs to be created. That is obvious. God doesn't.
God needs to be created, that is equally obvious. Since he's been around
since the beginning of time, and time didn't exist before the Big Bang,
it follows that God was created in the Big Bang, along with the rest of
the universe.
-- "Suppose you were an idiot... And suppose you were a member of Congress... But I repeat myself." - Mark Twain
- Next message: mitch perkins: "Re: Yes Science Needs God"
- Previous message: Eric Gisse: "Re: When Mass Doesn't Resist"
- In reply to: Mitchell: "Re: Yes Science Needs God"
- Next in thread: Bill Hobba: "Re: Yes Science Needs God"
- Reply: Bill Hobba: "Re: Yes Science Needs God"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|