Re: God=G_uv PURE PHYSICS
From: George Hammond (research137_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 08/26/04
- Next message: sal: "Re: Relativity IQ Test. Synching Clocks Absolutely."
- Previous message: mitch perkins: "Re: Yes Science Needs God"
- In reply to: Mark Fergerson: "Re: God=G_uv PURE PHYSICS"
- Next in thread: Rick Cvejic: "Re: God=G_uv PURE PHYSICS"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 20:49:16 GMT
"Mark Fergerson" <nunya@biz.ness> wrote in message
news:ecqXc.9$bT1.6@fed1read07...
> George Hammond wrote:
>
> > "Rick Cvejic" <hybridgex@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:6ef5b8f1.0408252124.13447619@posting.google.com...
>
> <snippage here and there>
>
> >>You assert that BGD changes (decreases) as we grow to adulthood, and
> >>that it has been trending downward for generations. Profound. So God
> >>was more real in the Middle Ages than now, and is more real when
> >>you're young, and less real as you age. Wow! I suppose that explains
> >>the 'ole 'childhood wonderment', not to mention the superstitous
> >>nature of historical peoples.
>
> > [Hammond]
> > Astute observation. Every statement you have made is exactly
> > true. I would guess, judging from Secular Trend data, that the
> > "size of Heaven", or "God in Heaven", was probably twice as
> > large during the Dark Ages as it is now. This doublessly explains
> > such phenomena as the Notre Dame or Reims cathedrals, and
> > the Crusades .. not to mention the Inquisition etc. How large
> > Heaven was during the Apostolic Age we can only guess... but
> > judging from the New Testament, it must have been even larger
> > still. Probably an all time high water mark for high levels of
> > (cf. Roman) civilization.
>
> Yet the "human condition" has steadily improved, on average, since
> then.
[Hammond]
Of course it has .... that's what an "increasing
Secular Trend MEANS theologically speaking, which is
apparently what you are doing... this means that "God is
descending from Heaven to Earth".... God is more
"in the flesh" percentagewise today than he was
thousands of years ago when he was still
"largly in Heaven".
> I'll point out that all these historical cultures relied on
> slavery (taking advantage of, and reinforcing, the BGD of certain
> segments of the general population; e. g. "white man's burden").
>
> In one sense slavery has become less acceptable since it's become
> more generally recognized that the more competent individuals are (the
> less their BGD), the more so the aggregate. In another sense it's simply
> become more subtle; slogans and small-group loyalties have replaced
> whips and chains.
>
> Slavery therefore can be called "BGD manipulation", and the modern
> sort is a difference in _kind_, not degree, which I am incompetent to
> express succinctly even though I perceive it. A mathematician could do
> so _and_ show how to repair and prevent it more economically than the
> traditional way, through messy, incomplete revolutions.
[Hammond]
Oh yes.... there's plenty of "slavery" around today. All you have to do
is go to a place like Alar I think it's called in India where they break
up ships on the beach. 6,000 barefoot and ragged Indians treck out
on the mud flats every morning and tear apart the ships for scrap
metal to turn into re-bars in an inferno they euphemistically call a
"factory" nearby. The wages are so low the men can barely get enough
to eat to keep working. The entire Third World is like this.
>
> > The most dramatic increase in the Secular Trend (shrinking
> > of Heaven) has been since the Industrial Revolution... but the problem
> > in the Third World still remains at critical levels... even in Moslem
> > countries.
>
> Because they refuse to be dragged into the present. To be more
> accurate, they're _unable_ to do so due to their BGD, which prevents
> them from doing a rational risk-benefit analysis of abandoning their
> traditions.
[Hammond]
Hey... its political gridlock and feudal warfare which is causing the
situation... and everybody knows it. It is up to us to stop it
before it becomes a problem which will kill us all either with
disease (like AIDS) or revolution like the terrorists are
probably a harbinger of. But what can we do... we are locked
in a gridlock of nuclear confrontation.
That's why I say that this "miracle" of the discovery of a
scientific proof of God WILL have some global impact on
the problem... just like the discovery of Christianity had a
global impact on the known world 2,000 years ago.
>
> >>So God is not a universal constant, or even a personal constant. He
> >>(it) varies from person to person, and disappears over time.
> >>Interesting....
>
> > [Hammond]
> > Yes... again.... precisely correct.... and this fact is what you need
> > to know, first and foremost.... to comprehend all of human history,
> > and the structure and phenomena of the contemporary world.
> > People who don't know it are literally in the dark... I hope you
> > can appreciate what kind of a problem this can cause in the world.
>
> Has caused, is causing, will cause, unless things change drastically,
> and soon. This is why I'm reminding you that I exist. It is _imperative_
> that the repressed be freed of their scales ASAP since WMD have replaced
> swords. Since "world leaders" have the most to lose and the least to
> gain (in their constricted worldview) from this, you'll have to either
> "cure" them first, or work from the bottom up.
[Hammond]
I don't think Bush and Putyn need any kind of a "cure"... I think
they need a "miraculous new tool" to help unify and pacify
the global population. I think a "scientific proof of God" and
the de facto unification of the world's religions which will
result can do nothing but HELP THEM do the job!
>
> >>Okay, so, the bigger your BGD, the more necessary, or the more "real"
> >>God is to you. So, congrats all you atheists and agnostics! Hammond
> >>has proven that you are leagues ahead of the God-fearing plebians!
> >>Interesting that one of the most religious countries in the world is
> >>the USA. What does that tell us?
>
> > [Hammond]
> > It tells us that "we" are the ones who have to worry about
> > the large BGD in the rest of the world, and the fact that
> > those billions of blinded people can stampede like terrified
> > cattle at any moment.
>
> Because they are _unable_ to think rationally.
>
> >>Of course, it also explains suicide
> >>bombers - noone intelligent could possibly blow themselves up, but
> >>someone with a massive BGD would barely notice they were dead!
>
> > [Hammond]
> > Yes... all of the suicide bombers and hijackers show unmistakable
> > signs of severe develoopmntal problems, possible retardation even.
> > Given that the rational scientific explanation of "God" is unknown
> > in these cultures... they can become persuaded of very bizzare
> > pictures of reality. and not knowing what it is... errant religious
> > beliefs can be used to scare them into dong almost anything.
>
> An excellent reason to "cure" them, before they do any more damage.
[Hammond]
Cripes I'm working on it full time 7 days a week for 22 years.
How about finding some scientific help to get this thing
confirmed?
>
> > [Hammond]
> > Finally... I must say I am a bit nervous that a person like you...
> > without a security clearance..... should suddenly be one of only
> > a handful of men on the planet should be walking around with
> > this kind of information.... but, I suppopse, since you were the
> > one who obtained it by your own efforts while all the others,
> > save a few have simple ignored it. This tells me that you
> > apparently are somehow qualified to have it. Congratulations.
>
> EVERYONE is "qualified" to have this kind of knowledge simply by dint
> of being human, but suppressing it is to the benefit of "leaders".
> Applying it is what permits us to be "better than" animals, or the
> so-called "animalistic" nutcases that try to retard the growth of
> civilization in general due to their own neurotic need to be "better
> than the masses".
[Hammond]
Ummm.. yes there are people who would like to suppress
it.... the bad guys so called... but I don't think this includes
our top world elected leaders.... they need all the help they
can get.
On the other hand, I think it's time to inform the Iatollah
that he is NOT the world's leading authority on God... that in fact
modern Western Science has discovered a scientific proof
of God... and is therefore in the drivers seat.... not him.
>
> Application is the key, George, and that won't happen with your ideas
> until you do as I suggested and expand them into the kind of
> step-by-step procedures that will be blatantly obvious to anyone, within
> the limits of their individual BGD. Following those steps will be a
> self-reinforcing and in fact accelerating process; as one removes part
> of their scales, the rest become more obvious and more easily removed.
[Hammond]
No.... like most scientific discoveries this one is waiting
for a "white knight"... either a very talented individual
or a VIP or even a leading journal editor who decides it's
time to give it some press.
that's what this internet blitz is all about... searching for
the White Knight.
> I'll say it again; you don't need the help of religious, political,
> or any other kind of "leaders" since your ideas aren't (by current
> definitions) strictly religious or political, and in fact that kind of
> leader has the most to lose. You need help from people whose motives
> aren't compromised by their personal power agendas; theoretical
> mathematicians. Nobody else can possibly be qualified to expand your
> too-compact equation into the kind of accessible, even irresistible,
> arithmetic necessary to work its way into minds artificially corrupted
> through millenia of suppression.
[Hammond]
I still have hopes that the White Knight will surface
somehwere in or on the fringes of academia... doesn't
matter how much he knows... what matters is conviction
and motivation. It only takes ONE MAN to "second
a motion".... and I'm still looking for a second.
> Have you not noticed that you've had more useful correspondence from
> those with a mathematical bent?
[Hammond]
The most useful responses have come from "diamond in the
rough" amateurs... yes some of them math majors. But the
common denominator seems to be the guy who has a lot
more ability than people recognize... and it's bothering him
and there isn't much he can do about it..... somewhere,
somehow... that guy is going to come across this "theory"
and suddenly recognize a vehicle that will solve his problem.
Remember the other thing by the way... besides saving the
world Spiritually... this discovery is the first scientific theory of
Psychology (perceptual reality).... I see immediately the day
when "virtual reality technology" will become the main
toool of psychotherapy.... even popular psychology and
entertainment. Fortunes will be made when this theory is translated
into virtual technology applications... and whoever makes a name for
himself in this early research is going to ride the wave for
a lifetime career and probably clean up financially as a
consultant or as the founder of a new industry.
> Mark L. Fergerson
PS....
Jim Black:
The CUBE you cited at:
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god/ILLU4.jpg
was actually constructed using the "computer output data"
from research by Raymond B. Cattell's two well known
collaborators in a massive Factor Analytic confirmation
of the Cattell Personality Tests by Krug & John's in
1986... involving the testing of 23,000 people!
They simply published the "Factor correlation coefficients",
a 7x7 matrix. They DIDN'T KNOW it was a CUBE!
I had discovered theoretically that it was probably a cube,
so I took their correlation coefficients "the r's" and
transformed them into "angles" since it is known that
a correlation coefficient is simply the cosine of an angle
between the two eigenvectors (Factors) in Psychometry space:
angle = arcosine(r)
then, using these angles I graphically constructed the
resulting geometric figure, WHICH TURNS OUT TO BE A CUBE!
This graphical construction and the 7x7 matrix it is constructed
from can be seen at:
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god/5X7C0192.jpg
This is a cut and fold model, and I have one sitting on
my desk as a matter of fact. I discoverd this in March of
1994 and the model has colllected a considerable amout of dust
since then.
George
====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
1st mirror site:
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
2nd mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
new site (under construction):
http://home.comcast.net/~proof-of-god
====================================
- Next message: sal: "Re: Relativity IQ Test. Synching Clocks Absolutely."
- Previous message: mitch perkins: "Re: Yes Science Needs God"
- In reply to: Mark Fergerson: "Re: God=G_uv PURE PHYSICS"
- Next in thread: Rick Cvejic: "Re: God=G_uv PURE PHYSICS"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
